RackMonthPicker
Joda-Time
RackMonthPicker | Joda-Time | |
---|---|---|
- | 13 | |
42 | 4,981 | |
- | 0.2% | |
0.0 | 6.3 | |
almost 3 years ago | about 2 months ago | |
Java | Java | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
RackMonthPicker
We haven't tracked posts mentioning RackMonthPicker yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
Joda-Time
-
Jiff: A brand new Datetime library for Rust, from the builder of ripgrep
In Java they had the same problem. The Java standard library implementation wasn't great, Jodatime came along to address those issues. Java 8 then introduced a new DateTime API that was heavily influenced by Jodatime with the benefit that as it is in the standard library, it can be more heavily adopted by library-writers.
https://www.joda.org/joda-time/
-
Don't use clj-time, use clojure.java-time instead
Not a big deal. That should be it, right? Not too soon! Turns out clj-time is a wrapper of Joda Time and the project's README says:
-
Should I Rust or should I Go
>> Note that boost is also not the C++ standard library.
I know, but many components that are now in the C++ standard library were previously in Boost or were heavily influenced by / inspired by Boost:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59912393/boost-libraries...
Similar events also happened in Java 8 with the Joda time library:
https://www.joda.org/joda-time/
>> serde's main maintainer is also a member of the libs team, so it being moved into the standard library meaning more maintenance doesn't really make sense to me.
I did not know that.
I was just using serde as an example of a widely-used crate that feels essential enough to be included in the Rust standard library.
At what point does a third-party crate become so useful that it might be considered for inclusion in the Rust standard library?
Is there a process for adding crates to the Rust standard library?
If so, how do such crates get nominated and approved?
-
/u/iamthatis debunks reddit's claims regarding threats, payment, and "working with developers"
I have one, and only one, suggestion for u/spez. To throw the ball in Christian's court, make him a genuine offer to work at reddit on getting your own iOS app based on apollo. Similar to how Sun threw in the towel to develop decent date time handling in Java and backed JSR-310, involving the author of joda time.
-
u/Hiddencamper explains the cost of replacing lightbulbs in a nuclear power plant (to illustrate the absurdity of nuclear power regulation)
But it does not say "nuclear" projects. For a comparison, our CEO started in my position and worked their way up. So they know the technical aspects of my job and don't need a slide on why we're using joda-time instead of the built-in Date library in the JDK.
-
Best way to store Date and time ?
You can look back at the notes under JSR-310 and Joda-Time, projects that improved upon Java's time handling prior to Java 8.
-
Create signature date and It should be either todays date or future date but can not be past date. [java 7]
For Java 7 you can use Joda Time. It was developed by the same person who was one of the developers of the Java 8 Date Time Api.
-
When applying for a position which is above a junior level,does personal projects not matter?
Many languages, frameworks and libraries are open source. For example, Golang, React, Joda-time
-
What is the preferred way to represent dates in Java?
Back when I used Java, it was Joda-Time but it seems they are recommending java.time instead.
-
New Java 8 time api "Local"* is counterintuitive to me
For some background: Java 8 time package is basically just JodaTime. JodaTime was used in almost all pre-8 projects because the pre-8 date/time API in Java is just horrible. They got it completely wrong twice even.