Office-Code-Pro VS juliamono

What was new to me from this thread and made me curious are these fonts: * https://github.com/nathco/Office-Code-Pro * https://github.com/microsoft/cascadia-code * https://www.recursive.design/

There's also Office Code Pro [1], a variant with slashed zeroes, less stylized bangs and different lowercase "i" and "g", among other subtleties.

[1] https://github.com/nathco/Office-Code-Pro

I use JuliaMono most of the time. I sometimes switch to Berkeley Mono if I want fewer flourishes. I built an on-the-fly font switcher into my terminal so it's super easy to flip back and forth as the mood suits me.

Julia has made symbol input manageable and lets you define infix operators for many of the Unicode symbols that make sense for that. [1] And JuliaMono was designed to support the symbols that Julia does. [2]

I generally do quite fine with my Compose Key configuration, though (even on Windows, where I use WinCompose). [3]

[1]: https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/unicode-input/

[2]: https://juliamono.netlify.app/

[3]: https://github.com/samhocevar/wincompose

Consider Julia Mono. It has massive Unicode support and looks nice.

In a less-condensed typeface, I happen to like JuliaMono.

You could try JuliaMono. It has the most extensive gallery of glyphs of all the fonts I know of.

JuliaMono: https://juliamono.netlify.app/.

JuliaMono typeface (Not an app, but much worth having.)

Change to a font that contains those Glyphs. JuliaMono is probably the best option in terms of the number of provided glyphs: https://juliamono.netlify.app/.