Mondocks
FSharpPlus
Our great sponsors
| Mondocks | FSharpPlus | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 44 | 821 | |
| - | 1.7% | |
| 3.7 | 8.8 | |
| 7 months ago | 3 months ago | |
| F# | F# | |
| MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Mondocks
-
Data Access in Fsharp
Mondocks - MongoDB DSL for the MongoDB .NET Driver
FSharpPlus
- Is it possible to add a NuGet package dependency to a project that points to a GitHub repository?
-
What is the difference between an Applicative and a Monad?
This should all be prefaced by saying that F# tends to avoid such category theory generalizations (unless you're using a library such as F#+ ). So, while I would encourage your continued understanding of the theory (it can be fun!), it's not as practical for writing good F# code as it would be in, say, Haskell. There are no type classes in Haskell, nor are there plans to add them.
-
Don Syme explains the downsides of type classes and the technical and philosophical reasons for not implementing them in F#
There maybe be a way to make it not have overhead. But there is precedent that this is not the case with Statically Resolved Type Parameters, and existing mechanism in F# that already lets you encode Haskell-style typeclasses and is the backbone of FSharpPlus, a typelevel (and more) library for F#. Solving constraints like this at compile-time (as opposed to having a runtime natively understand them) absolutely, positively leads to explosive compile times if you're not careful. I worked on the F# compiler for 5 years and I can attest to numerous reports related to accidental compile-time explosions just because SRTPs or inline was used a particular way.
-
Practically speaking, what does F#'s lack of higher-typed kinds mean?
F# devs tend to use SRTP (Statically resolved type parameters) see F#+ https://github.com/fsprojects/FSharpPlus .
-
F#+ 1.2 Released 🔷🚀
F#+ (FSharpPlus) 1.2 released with the following changes:
What are some alternatives?
Donald - A lightweight, generic F# database abstraction.
language-ext - C# functional language extensions - a base class library for functional programming
Npgsql.FSharp.Analyzer - F# analyzer that provides embedded SQL syntax analysis, type-checking for parameters and result sets and nullable column detection when writing queries using Npgsql.FSharp.
aether - Optics for F#
fio - :wrench: A type-safe, highly concurrent library for F# based on pure functional programming
fslang-suggestions - The place to make suggestions, discuss and vote on F# language and core library features
Dapper.FSharp - Lightweight F# extension for StackOverflow Dapper with support for MSSQL, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite
hacn - A "monad" or DSL for creating React components using Fable and F# computation expressions
VisualFSharp - The F# compiler, F# core library, F# language service, and F# tooling integration for Visual Studio
FStar - A Proof-oriented Programming Language
DustyTables - Thin F# API for SqlClient for easy data access to ms sql server with functional seasoning on top