principia
The Principia Rewrite (by LogicalAtomist)
Transformer-in-Transformer
An Implementation of Transformer in Transformer in TensorFlow for image classification, attention inside local patches (by Rishit-dagli)
Our great sponsors
principia | Transformer-in-Transformer | |
---|---|---|
10 | 4 | |
198 | 41 | |
- | - | |
2.7 | 0.0 | |
9 months ago | about 2 years ago | |
TeX | Jupyter Notebook | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
principia
Posts with mentions or reviews of principia.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-21.
-
Principia Mathematica in modern notation.
You can check it out here: https://www.principiarewrite.com/
-
It took Russell and that other guy 360 pages to prove that 1+1=2. That's how rigorous math is.
It's crazy to think that we didn't really know for sure whether 1+1=2 until ~1910, yet it's true. That's when Bernard Russell (best known for Russell's teapot, exposing a logical fallacy in Christianity) and some other dude actually proved it from axioms. They laid out the foundation of 1+1 in a book called Principia Mathematica. They worked so rigorously that it took them 360 pages to even prove something as basic as 1+1=2 using the axiomatic method. If you want to use a modern tool like Coq to verify 1+1=2, then the best way of doing this is to formalize Principia Mathematica in Coq.
-
Which is the most abstract and bizzare book of mathematics you have ever came across?
There are people trying to make it more readable.
-
Ask HN: Would prog. language look like if that was designed by no-programmer
Principia
A work from the early 20th century, mathematics, logic.
I think some expert called Bertrand Russell's and A.N. Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica" initiative a "bizarre" piece of work, when seen from the perspective of a programming language designer.
I can't make a qualified statement about this, as I am neither a mathematician nor a language designer. And I cannot find the exact quote on the internet, sorry. Just saying.
In code? See for yourself :
https://www.principiarewrite.com/
-
Hacker News top posts: Dec 6, 2021
Whitehead and Russell’s Principia rewritten in Coq\ (44 comments)
- Whitehead and Russell’s Principia rewritten in Coq
- The Principia Rewrite: Whitehead and Russell’s Principia Rewritten in Coq
Transformer-in-Transformer
Posts with mentions or reviews of Transformer-in-Transformer.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-06.
- I Implemented Transformer in Transformer
-
Hacker News top posts: Dec 6, 2021
I Implemented Transformer in Transformer\ (5 comments)
- [P] I implemented Transformer in Transformer
What are some alternatives?
When comparing principia and Transformer-in-Transformer you can also consider the following projects:
Coq-Equations - A function definition package for Coq
poolformer - PoolFormer: MetaFormer Is Actually What You Need for Vision (CVPR 2022 Oral)