Literate VS clojure-small-pieces

What does your Literate.py implementation offer over the https://github.com/zyedidia/Literate app written in D?

That sounds like a nice way to do it, too. I heard about it before, but don't know R, so I didn't really consider it.

The reason I chose lmt is that it correctly keeps the markdown language syntax of the code blocks. That means I can put my literate config into my Zettelkasten [1] or [2] and watch it pretty-print in the browser.

There are also literate [3] and org-babel [4], but I don't think they are future proof. .lit is a random format and .org basically requires Emacs+orgmode.

1: https://github.com/srid/emanote

2: https://wiki.dendron.so/

3: https://github.com/zyedidia/Literate

4: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html

I've been writing literate programs for years

Here is a video showing a literate form of Clojure:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDlzE9yy1mk

The literate program creates a new PDF and a working version of Clojure, including running a test suite. If you change the literate code and type 'make' it re-makes the PDF with the new changes and rebuilds/retests Clojure.

and here is the source:

https://github.com/robleyhall/clojure-small-pieces