LaTeXML
plain_latex_book
LaTeXML | plain_latex_book | |
---|---|---|
3 | 1 | |
850 | 4 | |
- | - | |
8.7 | 3.4 | |
7 days ago | 28 days ago | |
Perl | TeX | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
LaTeXML
-
Wikipedia of Algebraic Geometry Will Forever Be Incomplete. (2022)
Stacks project is available on github, so in theory (if you're bored enough) it should be possible to reverse engineer their design from their make-project file https://github.com/stacks/stacks-project/blob/master/documen...
At a high level they use plastex https://github.com/plastex/plastex to convert latex to html (you seem to be using pandoc?) and so can control the rendering to any fine accuracy they want. I liked this general style as well, so I tried using plastex but couldn't get my head around it and so started using LateXML https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML
My usecase: I wanted to have a "dependency graph" of lemmas to make it easier to see proofs without having to jump back and forth through a pdf, and this was sort of similar to lean formalization blueprint graphs https://teorth.github.io/pfr/blueprint/dep_graph_document.ht... (which also uses plastex) but without the lean parts. There's still a lot of work to be done, but I think I have a pretty okay implementation using latexml which meets 50% of my requirements for now, so I'm happyish https://texviz.arsricharan.in/ghrss24/
-
I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)
LaTeML [1] is presumably the latex to html tool that arXiv is testing right now. What are peoples thoughts about it compared to other such tools?
[1] https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML
-
Python Type Hints Are Turing Complete
They aren't using the rendered PDFs. They are convering from the LaTeX sources, that you upload to arxiv with https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML
plain_latex_book
-
I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)
https://github.com/myst-templates/plain_latex_book/blob/main...
GitHub supports AsciiDoc in repos and maybe also wikis?
Is there a way to execute code in code blocks in AsciiDoc?
latex2sympy requires ANTLR.
What are some alternatives?
python-typing-machines - Python type hints are Turing complete.
xlcalculator - xlcalculator converts MS Excel formulas to Python and evaluates them.
di - Pythonic dependency injection
json-parser-in-typescript-ver
Asciidoctor - :gem: A fast, open source text processor and publishing toolchain, written in Ruby, for converting AsciiDoc content to HTML 5, DocBook 5, and other formats.
ar5ivist - A turnkey command for converting a LaTeX source to ar5iv-style HTML
pydantic - Data validation using Python type hints
stacks-project - Repository for the Stacks Project
python-tabulate - Pretty-print tabular data in Python, a library and a command-line utility. Repository migrated from bitbucket.org/astanin/python-tabulate.