JSONAssert
RabbitMQ-mock
| JSONAssert | RabbitMQ-mock | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | - | |
| 963 | 173 | |
| -0.3% | -0.6% | |
| 0.0 | 8.6 | |
| 8 months ago | 16 days ago | |
| Java | Java | |
| Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
JSONAssert
-
Unit Testing Backward Compatibility of Message Format
And finally, we check that the supplied json equals to the one we got on step 3 (I use JSONAssert library here). The false boolean parameter tells to check only overlapping fields. For example, if the actual result contains the addressV2 field and the expected object doesn’t, it won’t trigger the failure. That’s a normal situation because backward compatibility data is static while the OrderCreated might grow with new parameters.
-
Stop requiring only one assertion per unit test: Multiple assertions are fine
This can be improved, it'd be worth Googling for a better solution than what you have.
https://github.com/skyscreamer/JSONassert seems decent.
but it can be done from scratch in a few hours (I'd recommend this if you have 'standardized' fields which you may want to ignore):
1) Move to a matcher library for assertions (Hamcrest is decent), and abstract `toJSON` into the a matcher, rather on the input.
This would change the assertion from:
`assertEquals(toJson(someObject), giantJsonBlobFromADifferentFile)`
to:
`assertThat(someObject, jsonEqual(giantJsonBlobFromADifferentFile))`
The difference here is subtle: it allows `jsonEqual` to control the formatting of the test failure output, so on a failure you can:
* convert both of the strings back to JSON
* perform a diff, and provide the diff in the test output.
Decent blog post on the topic: https://veskoiliev.com/use-custom-hamcrest-matchers-to-level...
RabbitMQ-mock
We haven't tracked posts mentioning RabbitMQ-mock yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
What are some alternatives?
Spock - The Enterprise-ready testing and specification framework.
WireMock - A tool for mocking HTTP services
AssertJ - AssertJ is a library providing easy to use rich typed assertions
MockServer - MockServer enables easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS with clients written in Java, JavaScript and Ruby. MockServer also includes a proxy that introspects all proxied traffic including encrypted SSL traffic and supports Port Forwarding, Web Proxying (i.e. HTTP proxy), HTTPS Tunneling Proxying (using HTTP CONNECT) and SOCKS Proxying (i.e. dynamic port forwarding).
Hamcrest - Java (and original) version of Hamcrest
Karate - Test Automation Made Simple
TestNG - TestNG testing framework
Mockito - Most popular Mocking framework for unit tests written in Java
REST Assured - Java DSL for easy testing of REST services
Citrus - Framework for automated integration tests with focus on messaging integration