GETProtocolCoreV1.0-DEPRECIATED VS Grassmann.jl

I'm gonna go with the GET Protocol website: https://get-protocol.io/

Also check out GET https://get-protocol.io/

Not shilling - really this is just for info - but "GET Protocol " are trying to do exactly that.... https://get-protocol.io/

Anyway, here is GET main website and then the blog is here.

It'll depend on the pandemic, but my money is on GET Protocol (https://get-protocol.io/).

If you go with the "pay 20mln for a rock jpeg" NFTs then no, I doubt those would get more value over time. However, there are other, better, usecases with NFTs where I could see the value rising over time. GET Protocol for example (protocol for selling scalp free ticketsz, see https://get-protocol.io/) makes every ticket an NFT. Imagine buying the first Rammstein VIP NFT ticket for the normal sell price, let's say 500 euros. Now imagine Rammstein says "if you have a VIP NFT from us, we'll half the price of every ticket/merch you buy afterwards!".

It did a x30 in about 2 weeks I believe, from 0.30 euros to 9 euros. Retraced back afterwards (but still x10), but is growing once again. I got a feeling it'll grow waaay more in the near as I believe it's massively undervalued. It's still a nano cap, but it's got an actual working (and used by multiple companies) product that keeps growing. Basically it provides a scalp free solution of selling tickets (right of entry). Highly recommend looking into it: https://get-protocol.io/

I think that's something different, I'm thinking of this: https://get-protocol.io/

Here's how to do it with Grassmann.jl

Surprise announcement: the next version of Grassmann.jl has a new algebra type SimplexComplex{V,B,T} (yes, that's right SimplexComplex) which is a wrapper for Julia's native Base.Complex{T} type. This allows you to work with the performance of the base language complex numbers while retaining the Grassmann algebra interface and additional products. The new type is not limited to only regular complex numbers, it supports the creation of a SimplexComplex using any basis element B by simply taking the sum of a scalar with that basis element. ```Julia julia> using Grassmann

I still have never been able to post my paper about my Grassmann.jl geometric algebra foundations research on arxiv.

https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl

Seems like a useless overrated website.

I was able to post my article on my own website instead.

Arxiv is really a useless website.

This article is really about geometric algebra, check out my geometric algebra software https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl

https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl

In the future, geometric algebra will likely be part of everything we do, but it is still very unknown as of now.

I heart your Grassman gradient vector field representations: https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl. They, heh heh, point the way toward representing aspects of physics and math that should be used far more frequently than they are now. They display the quirks that you could never apprehend looking at an equation. Your representations could eviscerate the representations of data base on paper-like metaphors.

Sadly our leaders, the John Baez and Scott Aronson and people like that, prefer to think in Euler notation and WordPress posts. As Kurt Vonnegut said: So it goes.

The world of representation of difficult concepts using interactive 3D and elegant code is still in its infancy. You are not yet at the ground floor of the construction of a future elegant structure. You - and a few others - are in at the second basement.

Fortunately, the only way out is to look up!