Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit
A Modern Fortran Library for Astrodynamics 🚀 (by jacobwilliams)
gtk-fortran
A GTK / Fortran binding (by vmagnin)
| Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit | gtk-fortran | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 160 | 245 | |
| - | - | |
| 4.2 | 6.9 | |
| 2 months ago | 18 days ago | |
| Fortran | Fortran | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit
Posts with mentions or reviews of Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-09-02.
-
How much useful are Runge-Kutta methods of order 9 and higher within double-precision arithmetic/floating point accuracy?
In addition, I found the following Fortran package ( https://github.com/jacobwilliams/Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit/blob/master/src/rk_module_variable_step.f90 ) that implements RKF8(9) and its coefficients . I don't see differences with the coefficients I typed and the ones on here.
gtk-fortran
Posts with mentions or reviews of gtk-fortran.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-20.
-
Is it possible to create a Sierpinski Triangle with Fortran?
The answer to 2) is more complicated, because in any language writing graphics is more complicated, because the hardware changes. The way you did it in Turbo C would not work today in Windows 11 (at least, not easily), nut as u/Uncle-Rufus says, you just need the right library, for example gtk-fortran. Here's Fortran code to create a Sierpinski Triangle in a PNG image file using that library, doing it to screen will be a little, but not much, more complicated.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit and gtk-fortran you can also consider the following projects:
pyplot-fortran - For generating plots from Fortran using Python's matplotlib.pyplot 📈
vizia - A declarative GUI library written in Rust
DiffEqDevTools.jl - Benchmarking, testing, and development tools for differential equations and scientific machine learning (SciML)
Fortran-MOOC - Material related to the PRACE MOOC on Fortran programming
json-fortran - A Modern Fortran JSON API
costa - The Costa Graphical User Interface for MS-DOS and compatible systems
fpm - Fortran Package Manager (fpm)
stdlib - Fortran Standard Library
ASFML - Ada binding to the SFML library
Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit vs pyplot-fortran
gtk-fortran vs vizia
Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit vs DiffEqDevTools.jl
gtk-fortran vs Fortran-MOOC
Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit vs json-fortran
gtk-fortran vs costa
Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit vs fpm
gtk-fortran vs json-fortran
Fortran-Astrodynamics-Toolkit vs stdlib
gtk-fortran vs fpm
gtk-fortran vs ASFML
gtk-fortran vs pyplot-fortran