FastDoubleParser
oss-fuzz
Our great sponsors
FastDoubleParser | oss-fuzz | |
---|---|---|
5 | 31 | |
165 | 9,907 | |
- | 4.4% | |
8.0 | 9.9 | |
5 months ago | 2 days ago | |
Java | Shell | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
FastDoubleParser
- FastDoubleParser: Java port of Daniel Lemires fast_double_parser
-
Port of Lemire's Double parser is more than 4X faster than openjdk double parser
The "isInteger" method looks like it transposed >= with <= on the bound check here. C++ version in comparison here. Didn't look at how it's used in the code to figure out how the tests/benchmarks would have passed though then?
oss-fuzz
- Xz: Disable ifunc to fix Issue 60259
-
Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server compromise
> because the ifunc code was breaking with all sorts of build options and obviously caused many problems with various sanitizers
for example, https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/10667
-
Ask HN: Any Good Fuzzer for gRPC?
Have you tried Googles grpc fuzzer?
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/blob/master/projects/grpc...
-
Pacemaker should be running open source software
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-ex...
oss-fuzz: https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz :
> We support the libFuzzer, AFL++, and Honggfuzz fuzzing engines in combination with Sanitizers, as well as ClusterFuzz, a distributed fuzzer execution environment and reporting tool.
> Currently, OSS-Fuzz supports C/C++, Rust, Go, Python, Java/JVM, and JavaScript code. Other languages supported by LLVM may work too. OSS-Fuzz supports fuzzing x86_64 and i386 builds.
-
Fuzz Testing Is the Best Thing to Happen to Our Application Tests
I love fuzzing as a technique and use it quite regularly, but running AFL++ on even a single program occupies all threads of a high end AMD server for weeks. I'm running it locally so only paying for the electricity. If it was a cloud instance it would cost a small fortune. I think this is a reason it is not used more widely.
I will note that Google have a programme for doing fuzz testing on open source projects using computer from their cloud: https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/
- Fixed Spelling Errors or Typos
- ELI5: How can downloading a pdf or word file give you a virus?
- OSS-Fuzz – continuous fuzzing for open source software
-
Mosh: An Interactive Remote Shell for Mobile Clients (2012) [pdf]
Yes, mosh has fuzz tests in oss-fuzz [1].
[1] https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/mosh
-
Java Fuzzing with Jazzer compared to Symflower
We will explore how Jazzer is used to automatically generate malicious inputs for Java programs, and how it compares to Symflower, which can automatically generate unit tests to uncover bugs and errors in your code. With the help of Jazzer, many bugs - some of them even in the OpenJDK - were found already. Also, as of March 2021, Jazzer is officially part of OSS-Fuzz, Google's cloud fuzzing engine. It should be noted that Jazzer is a pure "bug detection" utility that finds reproducers for errors in user code. Symflower can do the same, but provides additional functionalities to boost developer productivity, like generating high coverage unit tests and providing test templates for the software developer or tester.