Dart-Code VS Vim

It would probably be better if you file an issue here: https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues

I'm not aware of any other formatters for Dart. There's an open issue about more flexible formatting at https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/914 but it's not something being actively worked on. If someone was to create their own formatter I've offered in that thread to provide some pointers for wrapping it up into a VS Code extension (the Dart extension already supports disabling its own formatter, although VS Code now allows you to more easily select a different formatter).

This fix: https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/3332

Could you file an issue at https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code and attach a log captured with:

Creating it manually should also work. If that doesn't seem to be the case, please file an issue at https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code. Thanks!

Is this issue really resolved ?

Either I go with K552 or save for RK84 if not CB-GK-16 and both of these are pretty good choice that's certain, or I go with 617 Fizz and use VIM keybinding which Isn't an issue for me cause I've been using NeoVim for more than 1 year, you can grab my dotfiles if you want. Most people won't go with 60% cause they are used to arrow, home, end ... keys so am I with vs code but today I found out about vscodevim extension which enables vim keybinding , these keybindings pretty easy to use more than arrow, home, end .. keys if yo're a vim user like Shift + $ = end, Shift + 0 = home, in visual mode V to select text etc ...

There is also VSCodeVim extension: https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim which afaik does not use any external programms.

We're all biased here because you're asking in a neovim community. You should ask in a helix community but I think they'll also agree that you should learn vim first. Neovim and vim are the same in terms of modal editing. You may try vscodevim so that it doesn't change too much of your workflow and you can focus on the basic movement. And also you don't need to think about the neovim plugin ecosystem for now until you're comfortable with vanilla vim movement. For jetbrains products there are vim binding emulators too so it's more universal. I use vim emulator in intellij.

Are you familiar with vim q macros? It's a similar thing but you don't need to use maps/remaps to use them: q to start recording and q (in normal mode, so q sometimes) to stop recording. Then you can rerun the macro with @ (or @@ is rerun the last macro). (Even fun things like @ work to rerun the macro a number of times.)

VSCodeVim seems to support q-macros just fine. The lone silly missing bit is that VSCodeVim makes it slightly tougher to save/reuse q-macros than proper Vim [1]. In Vim those letters are the exact same "registers" as copy/paste so that you can record a macro to register 'a' with `qa…q` and then if you want to save that macro for later you can just paste it into a document somewhere `"a` (paste register a) and pull the macro back in with the right motion and yank to the register you want (`ya`). VSCodeVim unfortunately uses separate registers for now and it is a bit more work to save/restore q-macros.

[1] https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim/issues/1658

Checkmate: https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim

I don’t think either currently allows defining those on top of the extension, but you could in the extension itself. Or write it as a plugin extension, effectively, and bind it to whatever you want.

You might be interested in VSCodeVim giving you the power of vims workflow with the flexibility and extensibility of vscode.

Firenvim embeds Neovim in the browser, Qnvim in QtCreator, VSCodeVim/VSCode-neovim in VSCode... Why aren't they good examples in your opinion? :)

For these situations, I just use the regular Vim extension. It's portable and works well enough out-of-the-box. I'm not sure if it's worth going through the Neovim integration unless you want to configure it.