ConCert VS vericert

Compare ConCert vs vericert and see what are their differences.

ConCert

A framework for smart contract verification in Coq (by AU-COBRA)
Blockchain coq smart-contracts Verification
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

vericert

A formally verified high-level synthesis tool based on CompCert and written in Coq. (by ymherklotz)
high-level-synthesis coq
Source Code
vericert.ymhg.org
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
ConCert vericert
1 1
108 80
1.9% -
8.0 8.3
3 months ago about 2 months ago
Coq Coq
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ConCert

Posts with mentions or reviews of ConCert. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-06-23.

vericert

Posts with mentions or reviews of vericert. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-03.
  • There's an ongoing effort to rewrite Principia Mathematica using Coq
    5 projects | /r/math | 3 Dec 2021
    There are ongoing research projects about that, you may want to have a look at Kôika (https://github.com/mit-plv/koika), Kami (https://github.com/mit-plv/kami), Lutsig (https://github.com/CakeML/hardware) and silveroak (https://github.com/project-oak/silveroak). Closer to HLS there is also Vericert (https://github.com/ymherklotz/vericert). There may be other research project I am unaware of, feel free to add them in a reply, I am interested in it.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ConCert and vericert you can also consider the following projects:

hacspec - Please see https://github.com/hacspec/hax

koika - A core language for rule-based hardware design 🦑

scilla - Scilla - A Smart Contract Intermediate Level Language

CompCert - The CompCert formally-verified C compiler

Doubly-Linked-List-VST - The final project for CS2603 (2021 Spring), aiming to verify a doubly linked list library using VST. Collaborating with @karzexcc

silveroak - Formal specification and verification of hardware, especially for security and privacy.

magmide - A dependently-typed proof language intended to make provably correct bare metal code possible for working software engineers.

toychain - A minimalistic blockchain consensus implemented and verified in Coq

kami - A Platform for High-Level Parametric Hardware Specification and its Modular Verification

ConCert vs hacspec vericert vs koika ConCert vs scilla vericert vs CompCert ConCert vs Doubly-Linked-List-VST vericert vs silveroak ConCert vs magmide vericert vs Doubly-Linked-List-VST ConCert vs toychain vericert vs kami