CompactGUI
delta
CompactGUI | delta | |
---|---|---|
46 | 88 | |
4,515 | 20,765 | |
2.7% | - | |
7.7 | 8.1 | |
about 2 months ago | 4 days ago | |
Visual Basic .NET | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
CompactGUI
-
Is there a way to save space of ark?
CompactGUI
-
400GB? Seriously? 25+ hours worth of waiting just to play it? Why is ark like this?
Also, check out CompactGUI. It's a more user-friendly and efficient way of using Windows' built-in compression to cut the game's file size almost in half. It makes load times marginally longer (like 5-10%) and needs to be redone every few updates to keep the size down, but it works.
- Koji projekat na Githubu vas je odusevio u zadnje vreme?
- Games are becoming so large these days.
-
Modern Game File Sizes Be Like
You can chuck compact.exe at it by hand (use the /exe option), or if you'd prefer to avoid the command line there's my Compactor tool, or the venerable CompactGUI.
-
The era of 100GB games is upon us, and the average PC gamer is underprepared
You can also just use compactGui smaller filesizes without having to remove dialogs or cutscenes or anything. Obviously how much space is regained depends on how well it was compressed originally. With triple A titles perhaps getting 10% back, while things like ark can literally be shrunk by hundreds of gigs.
- Can we talk about client size? We are approaching 50GB!
- PSA: Use CompactGUI to reduce the the game's file size without any performance hit. I reduced the size from 81 GB to 56 GB.
-
For me ARK is 190GB but for my friend it is 160GB
Not really related to your question but if you want to try and save some space you can give this a go, I've used it before and never had any issues. https://github.com/IridiumIO/CompactGUI
-
WHY THE HELL IS MY ARK 355GB
Meet you new best friend. https://github.com/IridiumIO/CompactGUI
delta
- Difftastic, a structural diff tool that understands syntax
- Popular Git Config Options
-
So You Think You Know Git – Git Tips and Tricks by Scott Chacon
Thanks for the difftastic & zoxide tips.
However, I've been using this git pager/difftool: https://github.com/dandavison/delta
While it's not structural like difft, it does produce more readable output for me (at least when scrolling fast through git log -p /scanning quickly
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
- Potencializando Sua Experiência no Linux: Conheça as Ferramentas em Rust para um Desenvolvimento Eficiente
-
Unified versus Split Diff
I'm currently waiting on the integration between Delta and Difftastic:
https://github.com/dandavison/delta/issues/535
Difftastic now has JSON output, whic should make it much easier to build this.
- Delta, a syntax-highlighting pager for Git, diff, and grep output
- Ask HN: What's a new developer tool you recently started using?
-
Magit
I'm surely in the minority here. I've been using Emacs for almost a decade now, but I just can't get into the Magit workflow. I've tried several times, but always end up going back to Git on the command line. I have dozens of aliases, shell integrations, a nice diff viewer[1], etc., and interacting with Git has become muscle memory. I can commit, cherry-pick, rebase, bisect, fix conflicts, etc., in a fraction of the time it would take me to navigate Magit's UI. I'm sure with enough practice, a Magit user could do this more quickly and efficiently, but honestly, with some custom-built porcelain, Git's UI is not so bad. Though this could very well be Stockholm syndrome after using it for such a long time...
For whatever reason, Magit's opinionated workflows never clicked with me. A part of it is the concern that it will do something weird to my repo that I'll then have to waste more time undoing manually. I usually don't trust sugary wrappers around tools. And another is the fact I don't use Emacs on all machines, and setting up Git on a remote system is just a matter of copying over my config and some shell integrations.
Also, on a more personal note, I find the cultish fanboyism whenever Magit is brought up slightly offputting. Does anyone have anything bad to say about it? No software can realistically be this infallible. :)
[1]: https://github.com/dandavison/delta
-
How to use Git?
For looking at diffs I still prefer the command line though, and use delta to view diffs between commits or branches.
What are some alternatives?
Compactor - A user interface for Windows 10 filesystem compression
diff-so-fancy - Good-lookin' diffs. Actually… nah… The best-lookin' diffs. :tada:
ViVeTool-GUI - Windows Feature Control GUI based on ViVe / ViVeTool
difftastic - a structural diff that understands syntax 🟥🟩
WinPaletter - Advanced Windows Appearance Editor
vim-fugitive - fugitive.vim: A Git wrapper so awesome, it should be illegal
ripgrep - ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
lazygit - simple terminal UI for git commands
fclones - Efficient Duplicate File Finder
vim-gitgutter - A Vim plugin which shows git diff markers in the sign column and stages/previews/undoes hunks and partial hunks.
starship - ☄🌌️ The minimal, blazing-fast, and infinitely customizable prompt for any shell!
gitui - Blazing 💥 fast terminal-ui for git written in rust 🦀