Common-Lisp-Actors VS Lisp-Actors

Compare Common-Lisp-Actors vs Lisp-Actors and see what are their differences.

Common-Lisp-Actors

An actor system for Common Lisp. (by naveensundarg)

Lisp-Actors

Thread-agnostic Actors in Common Lisp (by dbmcclain)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
Common-Lisp-Actors Lisp-Actors
2 2
110 67
- -
0.0 9.8
over 4 years ago 19 days ago
Common Lisp Common Lisp
BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License The Unlicense
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Common-Lisp-Actors

Posts with mentions or reviews of Common-Lisp-Actors. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-24.
  • Moving from the BEAM to Common Lisp: What are my concurrency options?
    4 projects | /r/lisp | 24 Mar 2022
    There are very, very competent concurrency libraries already. I pointed you to them already. They serve as primitives to roll your own solutions -- You can get most of the functionality of Erlang actors (and virtually all of the important parts regarding concurrency) with threading (green or OS), CSP channels, and writing a few macros. Go look at a lot of the actor libraries you mentioned that are "long dead" and you'll notice they do A LOT with just a few hundred lines of code. This one gets basic functionality with just straight threading primitives in 131 lines.
  • Question about cl-async-await vs actors
    2 projects | /r/Common_Lisp | 4 Jul 2021
    As an alternative I was considering actors, f.ex. https://github.com/naveensundarg/Common-Lisp-Actors ,which seems simple enough. But the actor paradigm seems to require that all my code lives in actors. While I could make an actor that receives a message from the websocket listener when a message is incoming, it's a bit of a cumbersome setup compared to the linear looking code above. Since the message coming in will be decoupled from the request asking for the data, so it feels awkward. But maybe I'm thinking about it all wrong.

Lisp-Actors

Posts with mentions or reviews of Lisp-Actors. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-04-13.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Common-Lisp-Actors and Lisp-Actors you can also consider the following projects:

cl-gserver - Sento - Actor framework featuring actors and agents for easy access to state and asynchronous operations.

stmx - High performance Transactional Memory for Common Lisp

cl-skip-list - Lockless skip lists for Common Lisp; well, for now sbcl 1.0.42 or higher. Contributions for other Lisps welcome. See the README file for a list of what is required.