Chat-API
api
| Chat-API | api | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 4,240 | 65 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 7.9 | |
| almost 4 years ago | 12 days ago | |
| PHP | PHP | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Chat-API
api
-
Bought some flower from a PDX dispensary and the 'tested on' date is June of 2021 with the 'harvested on' date is October of 2021. How is that possible?
It's not that great, but we (OpenTHC) are trying -- https://api.openthc.org/
-
Ask HN: How to get compeitors to use our open source interop-prototcol?
We make open-source software for the cannabis industry, there are roughly 150 other software providers in this space, and we all need to share data (Lot details, Crop details, Product details, Lab Results, etc). Around 2018 or so we published a OpenAPI specification for data models ( https://github.com/openthc/api ) that we were hoping to get others to participate in. It's been rather difficult.
The previous blocker was that in much of the USA, this data flows through a central system operated by the Government (as a contract to BioTrackTHC, Metrc or Akerna/MJ Freeway/LeafData). So, there hasn't been a critical need for interop. However, recent states to legislate cannabis (Oklahoma, Maine) don't fully have that and one (Washington) is moving away from theirs at the end of the year.
The Washington state one is now, finally, getting some eyeballs to our API model. We'd been inviting these compititors for years to participate but it was crickets. Just recently a trade association stepped up efforts to get some parties to the table. After a few meetings we still haven't been able to even agree to agree. It's frustrating to be asked over and over if we're OK to have others contribute (TF!? we've been asking them for years). And the conversations go in circles:
a) what if we don't get everybody to participate? (we won't)
What are some alternatives?
Symfony GraphQl Bundle - Pure PHP implementation of GraphQL Server – Symfony Bundle
OpenCannabis - Central monorepo for the OCS specification.
smsc - Lib for modern integration smsc.ru service
php-struct - PHP Struct inspired by Go (golang)
chatify - Laravel's #1 one-to-one chatting system package, helps you add a complete real-time chatting system to your new/existing Laravel application with only one command.
Parser-PHP - Browser sniffing gone too far — A useragent parser library for PHP
Yasumi - The easy PHP Library for calculating holidays