webclient VS AppImageKit

Unfortunately ctemplar.com is shutting down - which is why I'm looking for a viable alternative. I've stumbled upon cyberfear in the process but have some questions.

CTemplar (version 1.6.0): Encrypted email that respects your privacy

I do have something to say about your "report" of the formatting issue. Reporting on Reddit is not reliable at all. I'm unsure if the devs even ever hear about it. The best way to get things done is via the GitHub I had a handful of issues I reported on Reddit and as far as I know, the team never got them until I posted a GitHub issue, at which point near all of them were fixed rather quickly. I'd suggest opening a GitHub issue to help the devs understand the widespread issue of the formatting problem. Sending it through reddit is like playing a complex game of telephone, whereas the GitHub gets you directly in contact with the devs.

E-Mail - Ctemplar/Tutanota

Ctemplar

We have recently fixed an issue with SimpleLogin: https://github.com/CTemplar/webclient/issues/1684

Is there a shortcut for the ctemplar.com like there is in protomail.com > pm.me ?

CTemplar is in Iceland https://ctemplar.com/

What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since i prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros.

Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years.

[0] https://appimage.org/

I found a similar issue on github and tried this solution but still getting the same error .

There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file.

[1] https://appimage.org

Nah i think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard.

Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins.

```dlopen(): error loading libfuse.so.2 AppImages require FUSE to run. You might still be able to extract the contents of this AppImage if you run it with the --appimage-extract option. See https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/FUSE for more information```

This doesn't look like a squashfs image. Cannot mount AppImage, please check your FUSE setup. You might still be able to extract the contents of this AppImage  if you run it with the --appimage-extract option.  See https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/FUSE  for more information open dir error: No such file or directory

appimages. Appimages are similar to flatpaks, exept that they are a file you download and double click to run. Think of them as portable softwares like windows has (portable apps). They are sandboxed too. You can learn more about appimages here