djangoproject.com

Source code to djangoproject.com (by django)

Djangoproject.com Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to djangoproject.com

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better djangoproject.com alternative or higher similarity.

djangoproject.com reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of djangoproject.com. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-01.
  • I'd like to look at well written Django projects.
    3 projects | /r/django | 1 May 2023
  • Is there a way to monitor a security advisory of a repository that you use?
    1 project | /r/github | 8 Feb 2023
    Not every project uses Github's advisories - e.g. Django: https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/security/advisories - but projects often publish advisories on their own site (e.g. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/releases/security/) or you might find them elsewhere (e.g. https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-10199/product_id-18211/Djangoproject-Django.html)
  • django books on testing
    2 projects | /r/django | 6 Dec 2022
  • Any enterprise level open source django project?
    12 projects | /r/django | 29 Dec 2021
    I am not sure if this fits the enterprise definition but djangoproject.com is open source https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com
  • Django well designed app.
    4 projects | /r/django | 17 Oct 2021
    Probably https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com
  • PHP maintains an enormous lead in server-side programming languages
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Sep 2021
    Sure, but this is still going to be pretty limited when detecting non-PHP languages. How are you going to detect a language which puts no extra headers in HTTP response and has no associated extensions?

    But, luckily for us, w3techs lets you check individual websites... and the data is often wrong or missing

    github on server side is Javascript! https://w3techs.com/sites/info/github.com (it is actually Ruby)

    Djagoproject.com on server side is unknown! https://w3techs.com/sites/info/djangoproject.com (it is actually Django, which is a Python web framework: https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com)

    microsoft.com was using PHP and WordPress "unil recently" https://w3techs.com/sites/info/microsoft.com

    gitlab.com is "ASP.NET, Python and Ruby (on subdomain) https://w3techs.com/sites/info/gitlab.com

    google.com, youtube.com and amazon.com are unknown https://w3techs.com/sites/info/google.com etc..

    ========

    I stand by my opinion that w3techs is junk when determining types of server-side language. The only reason there are so much PHP is because PHP is the biggest major language left which is easy to detect. And they hide the low quality of the results it by not including "unknown" category in the graph -- with that category, it would be much clearer how bad their detection works.

  • A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
    www.saashub.com | 30 May 2024
    SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →

Stats

Basic djangoproject.com repo stats
6
1,847
8.4
10 days ago

Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com