springdoc-openapi VS PMD

The issue is that the springdoc-openapi BOM brings an old version of the Spring Framework 6.0, which is incompatible with Spring Boot 3.2. There are several ways to solve this problem: update springdoc, change the order of BOM imports, but the best, in my opinion, is to avoid using the io.spring.dependency-management plugin.

I would suggest using Springdoc

The SpringDoc library comes with lots of annotations to tune your REST API specification precisely. Anyway, that's out of context of this article.

I found SpringDoc, a library that automates the generation of the spec from the source code. It relies on annotations for textual bits (like tags and descriptions), but it also infers stuff from Spring annotations.

This is an API made with Spring Web, uses springdoc-openapi-ui to expose a swagger-ui on http://localhost:8080/swagger-ui/index.html

Libraries like Springdoc or Springfox can do this. These libraries generate the OpenAPI documentation based on your controllers (+ you can apply the OpenAPI annotations on your controllers). This documentation is then exposed as a REST API, for Springdoc these can be found at /v3/api-docs.

Retrieving all endpoints of a service isn't the goal of a service registry like Eureka, so no, you can't get all endpoints of a service. You can use a library like Springfox or Springdoc to enable Swagger/OpenAPI for your project. These libraries generate a JSON REST API (and a user interface) to view all your endpoints. You can even provide additional information (eg. default values, descriptions, ...) by adding some additional annotations on your controllers.

The springdoc-openapi helps automating the generation of API documentation using Spring Boot projects GitHub - springdoc/springdoc-openapi

Our microservice accept http requests: For swagger used Swagger OpenAPI 3. The bank account REST controller, which accept requests, validate it using Hibernate Validator, then call command or query service. The main reason for CQRS gaining popularity is the ability to handle reads and writes separately due to severe differences in optimization techniques for those much more distinct operations.

PMD is a source code static analysis tool. It inspects your Java files for any issues, and has a configurable set of rules to look at.

While the security findings can be pretty elaborate and helpful, the code quality and performance focused findings are not that impressive and can often be detected by more basic or powerful tools like SonarQube (paying) or PMD (free). To see what I mean you can have a look at the list of Java code quality detectors, which is pretty short and contains a lot of simple findings like:

Also saw this convo has a couple years worth of ideas going on … https://github.com/pmd/pmd/issues/3413

PMD and Checkstyle are static analysis tools that check your code on each project build. Gradle allows to apply them easily.

The generated classes should be put into .gitignore. Otherwise, if you have Checkstyle, PMD, or SonarQube in your project, then generated classes can violate some rules. Besides, if you don't put them into .gitignore, then each pull request might become huge due to the fact that even a slightest fix can lead to lots of changes in the generated classes.

- PMD Static Code Analysis tool: https://pmd.github.io/

PMD, Spotbugs, Nullaway: Java linting/static analysis (https://pmd.github.io, https://spotbugs.github.io, https://github.com/uber/NullAway)

PMD, and checkstyle as well.

Open up the config/ruleset.xml file, and you’ll find an XML document that lists several rules. These rules map to the issues which PMD will report on. Believe it or not, there are hundreds of Apex rules, and you can find the full set at the PMD repo. You have complete control over which rules to enable. Typically, you’d determine which ones are important by agreeing with your teammates on the ones that matter most. After all, their code will be statically analyzed, too!