Google Fonts VS Next.js

The simplest and cheapest way of getting fonts to your app is Google Fonts. We need to open Google fonts page and type in the search panel the font we need, or just scroll and choose the font we like the most. There are two options for getting fonts: get embed code (in that case we will get 2 links which we should import directly to our index.html file and fonts will be downloaded to the client each time the app is opened), and "download all" (all types of chosen fonts will be downloaded to our machine and we can use them). We will use the second option and download fonts, I like "Libre Franklin" and will use this font in my e-commerce store. Then we will create a new "assets" folder with a "fonts" folder and paste all my fonts into this folder.

To find your desired font, visit Google Fonts and make a selection.

To find fonts we can simply search on the internet, there are a massive amount of services like fontspace, dafont or 1001fonts that are offering free and not free fonts. I suggest you use Google Fonts, that also offeres numerous variants of fonts and simple dashboard to help you find fonts you like.

Google Fonts is a library of thousands of font families created by Google that you can use in your project for free. Link:- Google Fonts

Google Fonts Roboto.

Head over to a font repository like Google Fonts and choose a font you like. Let's say we pick "Briem Hand" from the search input. Download the font files by clicking Get Font, usually provided in a zip format.

Thanks!, hadn’t come across Mebinac.

I’m also a big fan of Igino Marini’s recreation of the Fell typefaces:

The Fell Types took their name from John Fell, a Bishop of Oxford in the seventeenth-century. Not only he created an unique collection of printing types but he started one of the most important adventures in the history of typography. — https://web.archive.org/web/20240128075552/https://iginomari...

The IM Fell fonts themselves seem to live on Google Fonts these days: https://fonts.google.com/?query=Igino+Marini

I use Doves Type for… everything. One day I started to find my monomaniacal obsession a bit funny and sort of to spite myself I set every font in Firefox to Doves Type. Serif, sans-serif, monospace, no other fonts allowed, as well as the UI font by tweaking the Firefox user profile iirc.

And it was just… very good. And I kept using it.

I use Doves Type for everything, and to be able to do that on my phone I use iFont: https://apps.apple.com/is/app/ifont-find-install-any-font/id...

Or yeah I do use IBM PC VGA 9x16, IBM BIOS 8x8, and Eagle Spirit PC CGA Board Alternate 3 a little :) From the Ultimate Oldschool PC Font Pack: https://int10h.org/oldschool-pc-fonts/

I even munged together a combination of Doves Type Regular and IM Fell Great Primer Italic that matches the character scale and linespacing to both each other and to the IBM PC VGA 9x16 font at 1:1 size. FontLab did the trick!: https://fontforge.org/en-US/

(FontForge can autogenerate italics for any font. If you’re bored, I suggest loading up the classic VGA font and pressing the ITALICIZE button on ot. It’s… interesting!)

In general, on Windows I much prefer MacType’s fomt rendering: https://www.mactype.net … it’s kind of amazing that this kind of surgery is even possible.

Choose and download font When choosing a font for your application design, you need to consider the factors such as the font's readability, its contrast, how well it can scale on different devices, and whether it matches your application's brand and color scheme. After deciding the font, download its .tff files. One can get these files from Google Fonts. In this example, we will download 'Sedan SC' font.

Repository: Next.js

Next.js: npx create-next-app@latest

Remix is a very cool React-based framework that makes the final jump back from the browser to the server. After starting with SPAs that fully ran in the browser, Next.js got the idea of rendering React components in the server, reducing the initial load time and improving crawlability. Remix takes this a step further: while Next.js cannot render dynamic content on the server, Remix can. As a user, this means even faster loadings times for any kind of dynamic content, and as a developer, you don't need to think about server-side vs client-side components. You just write React code, and it works.

Here is the tricky situation and that's why CRA is in a semi-dead state, it has not been deprecated but isn't receiving any updates not even security updates, along with that the new React.dev documentation doesn't mention CRA but suggests using React meta-frameworks like Next and Remix for new projects. You can read more about React's reasoning for it in this github issue discussion.

Probably the most known example https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/19065

It was not an issue if you host in Vercel, as they provide the image optimization as a premium feature.

Implementing the requested feature would make the framework much better when self-hosted elsewhere. But there is neglection to resolve the issue. This is just one case.

This Reactjs version also includes React Server Components, so you can easily render components on the server. If you’re familiar with Next.js, whose components are server components by default, this is the same idea. Server components have advantages such as faster page load time, better SEO optimization, and overall better performance.

Next.js - for creating the application’s user interface and backend.

On fresh install (ts version), every page inside /src/app will throw module not found errors on imports. This is probably because in tsconfig.json, moduleResoultion is set to bundler. More here - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/41189

Next.js is a powerful React framework, that is widely used for building server-side rendered (SSR) or static web applications. Dockerizing a Next.js application can streamline the deployment process and ensure consistency between development, testing, and production environments