papers
carbon-lang
papers | carbon-lang | |
---|---|---|
85 | 175 | |
596 | 32,259 | |
2.0% | 0.5% | |
4.2 | 9.8 | |
15 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Perl | C++ | |
- | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
papers
-
Qt and C++ Trivial Relocation (Part 1)
It is slowly making its way through the standards committee. https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/43
The author has a fork of clang and gcc with some pretty impressive speedups, so I’m hopeful! https://lists.isocpp.org/sg14/2024/04/1127.php
-
Learn Modern C++
What's fun is, because everything is decided in papers, we can find out why! https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/884
Accepted paper here: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p20...
> The proposed std::print function improves usability, avoids allocating a temporary std::string object and calling operator<< which performs formatted I/O on text that is already formatted. The number of function calls is reduced to one which, together with std::vformat-like type erasure, results in much smaller binary code (see § 13 Binary code).
Additionally,
> Another problem is formatting of Unicode text:
> std::cout << "Привет, κόσμος!";
> If the source and execution encoding is UTF-8 this will produce the expected output on most GNU/Linux and macOS systems. Unfortunately on Windows it is almost guaranteed to produce mojibake despite the fact that the system is fully capable of printing Unicode
- The insanity of compile time programming
- P1673 A free function linear algebra interface based on the BLAS
-
When will std::linalg make it into a new C++ release?
See https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/557
-
C++ Papercuts
Bringing editions to C++ failed, and I am not aware of anyone trying to tackle the issues https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/631
(I could be wrong though! I follow the committee more than you may guess, but not as much as to think I know everything about what's going on.)
-
Argonne National Lab is attempting to replicate LK-99
GitHub would not be relevant in this respect because:
* It's owned by a (single) commercial corporation, Microsoft.
* There is censorship both by content and in some respects by country of origin.
* The code is closed.
but otherwise it's an interesting idea.
The C++ standardization committee uses GitHub to track papers submitted to them, see:
https://github.com/cplusplus/papers
-
C++23: The Next C++ Standard
There was no non-approval. The facility needs more work, and the authors (and the committee) were focusing on getting print/format done first. I hope that the paper will be worked on again in the future. We will be happy to review it once there is a revision (see github for history)
- What C++ library do you wish existed but hasn’t been created yet?
-
2023-06 Varna ISO C++ Committee Trip Report — First Official C++26 meeting!
For more details on what we did at the 2023-06 Varna meeting, the [GitHub issue](https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/328) associated with the paper has a summary.
carbon-lang
- Carbon Copy Newsletter No.2
-
Cpp2 and cppfront – An experimental 'C++ syntax 2' and its first compiler
The roadmap for Carbon [0] mentions wanting to have basic, non-trivial programs written in Carbon by the end of 2024. They're aiming for a v0.1 release in 2025. If it gains traction, they're aiming for a v1.0 beyond 2027.
I don't think anyone outside Google will seriously adopt this before it reaches v1.0. Even within Google, they may choose other options.
[0] - https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
- Carbon Language Newsletter, the Carbon Copy, February 2024
-
Odin Programming Language
Carbon was started by Chandler Carruth, at Google, but they wanted to move it to broader governance quickly. It's not under the Google GitHub today, but its own org.
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
-
C++ Should Be C++
What do you think about Carbon[1]? I am hopeful.
[1] https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang
- The NSA advises move to memory-safe languages
- Carbon Language: An experimental successor to C++
-
Toward a TypeScript for C++"
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
next year 0.1 will be usable, 1.0 is about 3 years away, sigh, back to my rust fight
-
Programming Languages Every Developer Should Watch Out For
1. Carbon
What are some alternatives?
circle - The compiler is available for download. Get it!
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
compiler-explorer - Run compilers interactively from your web browser and interact with the assembly
crubit
C++ Format - A modern formatting library
cppfront - A personal experimental C++ Syntax 2 -> Syntax 1 compiler
LEWG - Project planning for the C++ Library Evolution Working Group
Odin - Odin Programming Language
CPM.cmake - 📦 CMake's missing package manager. A small CMake script for setup-free, cross-platform, reproducible dependency management.
go - The Go programming language
tinyformat - Minimal, type safe printf replacement library for C++
hylo - The Hylo programming language