coffeescript
Unfancy JavaScript (by jashkenas)
proposal-types-as-comments
ECMAScript proposal for type syntax that is erased - Stage 1 [Moved to: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations] (by giltayar)
| coffeescript | proposal-types-as-comments | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | 32 | |
| 16,449 | 2,364 | |
| - | - | |
| 3.0 | 8.6 | |
| 3 months ago | about 2 years ago | |
| CoffeeScript | JavaScript | |
| MIT License | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
coffeescript
Posts with mentions or reviews of coffeescript.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-10.
- CoffeeScript
- Ask HN: Why don't browsers just build a non-JS interpreter?
-
alternatives to the javascript ecosystem
That said, there are ways to embrace the JS ecosystem without actually using JavaScript. Many popular languages have transpilers that will convert code written in that particular language into something that will run natively in a web browser (in other words, JavaScript). Even TypeScript is a language that gets transpiled into JavaScript, so it's not that outrageous of a concept, it just gets more difficult to do the further you get away from languages that don't already look like JavaScript.
-
Vanilla+PostCSS as an Alternative to SCSS
As a front-end web developer, do you still use CoffeeScript or jQuery? Unlikely, as TypeScript, ES/TC39 and Babel (and the retirement of Internet Explorer thanks to @codepo8 and his EDGE team) have helped to transform JavaScript into some kind of a modern programming language.
- Por que Elm é uma linguagem tão deliciosa?
-
An Introduction for TypeScript
CoffeeScript
-
Why React isn't dying
On the other hand, companies choose React because that's where all the developers are. If you want to build something that can be maintained years from now, you better not choose the next hype train that goes straight to nowhere (remember CoffeeScript ?). You want something battle tested that has stood the test of time, where you won't have trouble finding developers to scale once you need to. And nobody ever got fired for choosing React.
- List of languages that compile to JavaScript
- We're breaking up with JavaScript front ends
- Suggestion for coding project
proposal-types-as-comments
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-types-as-comments.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-23.
- Proposal-Types-As-Comments - ECMAScript proposal: Types as Comments
-
Thoughts on proposal For Type Syntax in JavaScript
As per the proposal:
- Amazon Corretto 18 is now generally available
- A few misconceptions people seem to have about the Types as Comments proposal
-
[AskJS] Why not just add 'application/typescript' support for browsers.
Not runtime ones. https://github.com/giltayar/proposal-types-as-comments/issues/45
- [AskJS] What features do you think this proposal is missing vs the current typescript state?
-
Deno Is Webby
I do wonder about a future where JavaScript gets non-enforced optional type annotation syntax[1] which is and if said syntax will be slightly incompatible with TypeScript. That would be a little awkward for Deno, wouldn’t it. However I hope that if JS gets type annotation syntax that it would be a strict subset of TypeScript—or at the very least future compatible—for this very reason.
1. https://github.com/giltayar/proposal-types-as-comments
-
I'll miss you, my love ...
I assumed the joke was about this
-
Microsoft proposes type syntax for JavaScript
It's actually Gil Taylor
The proposal on GitHub
What are some alternatives?
When comparing coffeescript and proposal-types-as-comments you can also consider the following projects:
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
corretto-17 - Amazon Corretto 17 is a no-cost, multi-platform, production-ready distribution of OpenJDK 17
emacs-ng - A new approach to Emacs - Including TypeScript, Threading, Async I/O, and WebRender.
browser-or-node - Check where your code is running. In the browser or in node.js environment.
purescript - A strongly-typed language that compiles to JavaScript
0.30000000000000004 - Floating Point Math Examples
imba - 🐤 The friendly full-stack language
typescript-eslint - :sparkles: Monorepo for all the tooling which enables ESLint to support TypeScript
servant - Main repository for the servant libraries — DSL for describing, serving, querying, mocking, documenting web applications and more!
sqlite3 - The fastest and correct SQLite3 module for Deno runtime
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
flow - Adds static typing to JavaScript to improve developer productivity and code quality.
coffeescript vs Elm
proposal-types-as-comments vs corretto-17
coffeescript vs emacs-ng
proposal-types-as-comments vs browser-or-node
coffeescript vs purescript
proposal-types-as-comments vs 0.30000000000000004
coffeescript vs imba
proposal-types-as-comments vs typescript-eslint
coffeescript vs servant
proposal-types-as-comments vs sqlite3
coffeescript vs Vue.js
proposal-types-as-comments vs flow