awesome-compose VS wg-easy

examples here: https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose/

Docker compose wraps the app and db in a few lines of config: https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose/tree/master/offici... the extra config is for networking / db connections - you don't get those on Android because you don't run network services on it.

K8s can do the same thing, but has more options.

Simplicity: Docker Compose is easy to use, requiring no extensive DevOps knowledge.

I'm a big fan of people who write guides to help - but to balance this, this can be deployed with a one liner, with NPM, its database and the WP frontend, with one line with docker-compose. It would be quicker to update, faster to boot and use noticeably less resources.   Good work on documenting your OVA conversion though, as that is still useful and can be generalized. :-)

I'm trying to use the react-express-mysql awesome-compose as a framework for setting up multiple react apps that are tied to the same domain. Once dev is complete, I update the Dockerfile for the frontend to add in Nginx and have Nginx serve the frontend so that it is not running using npm start. I additionally am using Nginx Proxy Manager as a reverse proxy to route where I need and manage SSL termination for me.

Take a look at https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose pick your stack and use docker compose up -d

Check out awesome compose there might be overlap projects

Maybe easier to link to a recommended docker compose config that also fails : https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose/tree/master/official-documentation-samples/wordpress/

After browsing through, I've noticed that three options seem to be gaining traction: Netmaker, wg-easy, and headscale. I'm curious to know if these solutions are interchangeable, and if there are specific reasons to choose one over the others. I'd also like to understand if they are complete stacks, meaning, once set up, could I easily replace one admin GUI with another, or would I need to tear down and rebuild the VPN?

WireGuard is the solution to everything! It has an app and they can easily login via a QR code that you send them. For the server I would recommend wg-easy, there you can manage all user accounts in a web interface.

I use this, https://github.com/WeeJeWel/wg-easy

Dashboard with access to the QR and config files for clients as well as bandwidth data. Even something as simple as wg-easy would be great.

I run wg-easy https://github.com/WeeJeWel/wg-easy for this sort of thing. I use the docker container, and it's great. "Just works".

Also, unrelated, I just decided I don't like the sentiment of "PiMyProjectName" branding. I know most projects don't just run on a Pi, and that the intent is to say "you can self-host thing", but at this point if you want to run a home server sort of thing, just buy some cheap 100-200 dollar minipc thing. That's how much you'd pay for a Pi now anyway, and it comes with such great features as:

* just establishing an ssh connection doesn't take multiple seconds

* the ethernet doesn't go over a usb hub

* it doesn't run on an sd card that is going to fail within a year

I'm pretty dismissive of ARM chips for homelab stuff at this point. There's super cheap minipcs with "real" processors that will just destroy even an expensive ARM board.

Pi's shine with their ability to run both a real/full Linux and also do gpio type stuff that otherwise is usually an arduino board. I don't have anything against low-level programming but damn is it just a lot more fun to do in python. I love the Rpi zero w 2 products for this, just enough juice to run wifi and a python loop, plus the gpio pins. Too bad they've been sold out for literally years.

J'ai installé Wireguard Server sur un VPS en utilisant [https://github.com/weejewel/wg-easy Peer to Peer Ping, mais je ne peux pas ping-ping à des pairs du serveur.

To expand: I'd recommend wireguard it's super easy to run with docker, openvpn is way more annoying to setup The Github page for wg-easy docker image

for wireguard im using wg-easy