autoprefixer VS React

Do you use Autoprefixer? https://github.com/postcss/autoprefixer

Simple, fast, and a little bit opinionated, Eleventy Plus Vite features Eleventy 2.0.0-canary, the new Eleventy 2.0 Dev Server with live reload, Vite 3.0 as Middleware in Eleventy Dev Server (using eleventy-plugin-vite), build output post-processing by Vite (with Rollup), CSS/Sass post-processing with PostCSS including Autoprefixer and cssnano, a custom CSS/Sass structure, basic fluid typography based on Utopia, dark mode support, an RSS feed, XML sitemap, and — to top it off — perfect scores on Lighthouse.

w/ postcss-preset-env(v7.8.3): convert modern CSS into something most browsers can understand, determining the polyfills you need based on your targeted browsers or runtime environments. It takes the support data that comes from MDN and Can I Use and determine from a browserlist whether those transformations are needed. It also packs Autoprefixer within and shares the list with it, so prefixes are only applied when you're going to need them given your browser support list.

As others have said, you need to normalize. Also, you may need something like autoprefixer if you're using styles that have different vendor prefixes. https://github.com/postcss/autoprefixer

Mmm maybe it's not gap then, maybe it's some other property. Maybe autoprefixer could help. Or polyfills, as other user suggested.

Of course, we have great tooling for that: Autoprefixer, PostCSS and Stylelint for CSS transformation, Babel and Webpack for JavaScript transpilation and bundling, ESLint for code analysis, and many others.

Bulma uses autoprefixer to make (most) Flexbox…

Repository: React

Creating a clone of the YouTube homepage can be both enjoyable and helpful for enhancing your front-end development skills. This project offers a chance to work on a familiar design while getting practical experience with commonly used tools like Tailwind CSS and React.js. It also helps you understand how modern web applications are structured and styled.

React.js

See the releases section of the React codebase, and see how many reactions each release note has!

You know you can just check before making these claims?

> In fact, for years, react didn't even tell in the doc you could use it without a transpiler so people had to learn a whole build chain before even getting to the hello world.

React's original documentation site from June of 2013 (when React was first introduced):

https://web.archive.org/web/20130607085014/http://facebook.g...

Feel free to click around that original documentation site.

Here's the README.md from the commit at the same time:

https://github.com/facebook/react/tree/a41aa76ef36471ba07b29...

> You'll notice that we used an XML-like syntax; we call it JSX. JSX is not required to use React, but it makes code more readable, and writing it feels like writing HTML. A simple transform is included with React that allows converting JSX into native JavaScript for browsers to digest.

At this point I would kindly ask you to go away.

For further insights, refer to the React documentation to learn more about the library.

To get started, let's quickly create a sample React app that has a build configured to export a static site. Even if you have a project in mind to deploy, I recommend going through the motions with a simple sample site, as you may run into implementation specific issues with your project & if you've never gone through the motions, it can be hard to determine whether you made a mistake in the deployment processes or if there are implementation specific issues you're facing.