aider
gpt-pilot
aider | gpt-pilot | |
---|---|---|
65 | 20 | |
10,371 | 28,772 | |
- | 2.3% | |
10.0 | 9.9 | |
4 days ago | 3 days ago | |
Python | Python | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
aider
-
I Spent 24 Hours with GitHub Copilot Workspaces
My open source tool aider [0] has long offered a "AI pair programming" workflow. Aider's UX is similar but not identical to Copilot Workspaces.
Aider is more of a collaborative chat, where you work with the LLM interactively asking for a sequence of changes to your git repo. The changes can be non-trivial, modifying a group of files in a coordinated way. So much more than just the original copilot "autocomplete".
Workspaces seems more agentic, a bit like Devin. You need to do a bunch of up-front work to (fully) specify the requirements. Then the agent goes off and (hopefully) builds what you want. You need to fully understand what you want to build up front, and you need the describe it unambiguously to the agent. Also, even with a perfect request, agents often go down wrong paths and waste a lot of time and token costs doing the wrong thing.
That's not how I code personally. My process is more iterative, where I explore the problem and solution spaces as I build.
The other difference between aider and Workspaces is that currently aider is a terminal CLI tool. Although I just released a basic browser UI [1] the other day, making it more approachable for folks who are not fully comfortable on the command line.
[0] https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider
[1] https://aider.chat/2024/05/02/browser.html
-
Agents of Change: Navigating the Rise of AI Agents in 2024
Aider was developed by Paul Gaither and focuses on giving developers a pair programming experience directly from developers' terminals. This command-line tool edits code in real-time based on a user prompt in the command terminal. As of writing, it only supports OpenAI’s API but can write, edit, and refine code across multiple languages including Python, JavaScript, and HTML. Developers can use Aider for code generation, debugging, and understanding complex projects.
-
2markdown – Transform Websites into Markdown
I built a similar thing in python using Playwright and Pandoc [0]. It's used by aider's `/web ` command that lets you paste a markdown version of any webpage into your AI coding chat. This helps if you want to include docs for an obscure or non-public package/api/etc with the LLM while coding.
I really value dependencies which are easy for all users to install, cross-platform. Playwright is nice because it has a simple way to install its dependencies on most platforms. And the `pypandoc` module provides a seamless install of pandoc across platforms.
The result turns most web pages into nice markdown without requiring users to solve some painful platform specific chromium dependency nightmare.
[0] https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider/blob/main/aider/scrap...
-
Aider: AI pair programming in your terminal
Thanks for trying aider, and sorry to hear you had trouble getting the hang of it. It might be worth looking through some of the tips on the aider GitHub page [0].
In particular, this is one of the most important tips: Large changes are best performed as a sequence of thoughtful bite sized steps, where you plan out the approach and overall design. Walk GPT through changes like you might with a junior dev. Ask for a refactor to prepare, then ask for the actual change. Spend the time to ask for code quality/structure improvements.
Not sure if this was a factor in your attempts? I'd be happy to help you if you'd like to open an GitHub issue [1] our jump into our discord [2].
[0] https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider#tips
[1] https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider/issues/new/choose
[2] https://discord.gg/Tv2uQnR88V
-
Ask HN: If you've used GPT-4-Turbo and Claude Opus, which do you prefer?
Have you tried something like Agentic’s Glide? (They announced it this week here on HN)
They use gpt, but they might be able to configure it so it uses Claude
Another tool to check out could be aider https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider
-
Launch HN: Glide (YC W19) – AI-assisted technical design docs
Are you aware of the work on https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider? What's your take on generating code diffs directly instead of code editing instructions?
-
A Man in Seat 61
He should add AI to his site!
Not really - the site is great as-is and there's nothing wrong with this approach. It looks like it works really well for Mr. 61.
But I'd imagine it'd be pretty helpful to write tools to help with maintaining the site which do leverage LLM models. Do a combination of search + AI to rewrite + reviewing the individual edits (e.g. through selective git adds).
I'm imagining a tool like https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider (which I haven't tried yet, but it looks useful for this kind of effort).
- Ask HN: What is the, currently, best Programming LLM (copilot) subscriptions?
-
Web Scraping in Python – The Complete Guide
I recently used [0] Playwright for Python and [1] pypandoc to build a scraper that fetches a webpage and turns the content into sane markdown so that it can be passed into an AI coding chat [2].
They are both very gentle dependencies to add to a project. Both packages contain built in or scriptable methods to install their underlying platform-specific binary dependencies. This means you don't need to ask end users to use some complex, platform-specific package manager to install playwright and pandoc.
Playwright let's you scrape pages that rely on js. Pandoc is great at turning HTML into sensible markdown. Below is an excerpt of the openai pricing docs [3] that have been scraped to markdown [4] in this manner.
[0] https://playwright.dev/python/docs/intro
[1] https://github.com/JessicaTegner/pypandoc
[2] https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider
[3] https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4-and-gpt-4-turb...
[4] https://gist.githubusercontent.com/paul-gauthier/95a1434a28d...
## GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo
-
DeepSeek Coder: Let the Code Write Itself
Thanks for trying aider, and sorry to hear you had trouble getting the hang of it. It might be worth looking through some of the tips on the aider github page:
https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider#tips
In particular, this is one of the most important tips: Large changes are best performed as a sequence of thoughtful bite sized steps, where you plan out the approach and overall design. Walk GPT through changes like you might with a junior dev. Ask for a refactor to prepare, then ask for the actual change. Spend the time to ask for code quality/structure improvements.
Not sure if this was a factor in your attempts? But it's best not to ask for a big sweeping change all at once. It's hard to unambiguously and completely specify what you want, and it's also harder for GPT to succeed at bigger changes in one bite.
gpt-pilot
-
What I learned in 6 months of working on a CodeGen dev tool GPT Pilot
For the past 6 months, I’ve been working on GPT Pilot (https://github.com/Pythagora-io/gpt-pilot) to understand how much we can really automate coding with AI, so I wanted to share our learnings so far and how far it’s able to go.
- GPT Pilot is a true AI developer that writes code, debugs it
-
GPT-4 vs Claude-2 context recall analysis
I’m working on an AI dev tool GPT Pilot that uses LLMs a lot. So, I was interested in context recall - however, it becomes more apparent at larger context sizes. In other words, how well can the LLM find the information it needs that is in the context? Less than ideal, as it turns out.
-
🛠️6 tools to kickstart your full-stack app with AI 🤖
Learn more about it and give it a try here: https://github.com/Pythagora-io/gpt-pilot
-
[Help] How can I appeal a deactivation/termination/ban?
I opened my account yesterday, as I wanted to test gpt-pilot, I generated an API key, added it to my .env file and made a small calculator just to see if it works (and it does). Today I got an email saying that my account was terminated for violating Terms of Service or not being in a supported country. The closest thing that I can think of for my ban after reading ToS and the list of countries was that my school uses GlobalProtect (a VPN) to connect to their services, so maybe that raised a red flag, but that's about it. I'm trying to find the option to "appeal the ban" on help.openai.com but I can't find it anywhere.
- GPT Pilot: A better variant of AutoGPT for devs?
- GPT Pilot, prompt driven app creation
- Ask HN: How can ChatGPT be effectively utilized in the work
- GPT Pilot
- 1.1k Stars Today: GPT Pilot helps developers build apps 20x faster 🔥
What are some alternatives?
gpt-engineer - Specify what you want it to build, the AI asks for clarification, and then builds it.
llama-cpp-python - Python bindings for llama.cpp
MetaGPT - 🌟 The Multi-Agent Framework: First AI Software Company, Towards Natural Language Programming
ollama-ui - Simple HTML UI for Ollama
developer - the first library to let you embed a developer agent in your own app!
tabby - Self-hosted AI coding assistant
gpt-pilot-timer-app-demo
continue - ⏩ Open-source VS Code and JetBrains extensions that enable you to easily create your own modular AI software development system
gpt-pilot-demo-markdown-editor
jsonformer - A Bulletproof Way to Generate Structured JSON from Language Models
gpt-pilot-chat-app-demo