Main
runtimelab
Main | runtimelab | |
---|---|---|
10 | 54 | |
1,521 | 1,348 | |
0.3% | 1.3% | |
10.0 | 4.3 | |
6 days ago | 2 days ago | |
PowerShell | ||
The Unlicense | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Main
- SumatraPDF Reader
-
My CNCF LFX Mentorship Spring 2023 Project at Kubescape
(merged) ScoopInstaller/Main #4757 kubescape: Update url and binary naming
- I built a cross-platform GUI management tool for LiteDB using AvaloniaUI
- Stupid Fast Scoop Search v1.0
- The scoop on Windows running Perl
-
In support of single binary executable packages
As I see it, part of the drive behind tools like Scoop is to overcome the limitations of the binary-shipping strategy common to Windows developers. They are successful at this, I agree, but only partially successful. They come from the tradition of programs like Ninite, which were explicitly built as ways to make the binary approach suck less than it did before.
I see the success of these programs as essentially stemming from the insertion of user interests in the form of a maintainer-like process. Sure, they're still working with the binaries, but the actual process of installing and managing these binaries is controlled by users, for users: https://github.com/ScoopInstaller/Main/tree/master/bucket
This means that you get moderation and in many cases modification to the behavior of the program. In a freeware environment like Windows that's full of shitware, at the very least you can in many cases strip out the ads. That's absolutely not nothing, but at the end of the day it comes from a group of user-maintainers stepping up and saying to developers that no, you cannot simply do whatever you want on my system with your software. That's ... sort of the whole point of a software distribution, in the Linux world!
When I want the latest version of a CLI tool on Linux, I simply `pacman -S package`. That's it; one command. I don't see how it could be any simpler or better than that, and on top of that I'm getting the benefits of moderation and integration with the rest of my system. Perhaps you are emphasizing latest version here, and hinting that you don't get that on Linux distros? That depends entirely on the distro; a software distribution is (roughly) a collection of user interests. An Arch user wants (and gets) the latest versions of all upstream software. A Debian user does not want this or see constant updating to the latest version as an advantage, so that's not what they get.
-
AVR GCC Toolchain - Setup for Windows
Here is the definition: https://github.com/ScoopInstaller/Main/blob/master/bucket/avr-gcc.json
-
WinGet is terrible. I want AppGet back
Those are all automated by the auto-update script.
Check Merged PRs https://github.com/ScoopInstaller/Main/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%... and you will see that the last non-bot one was merged 17 days ago.
runtimelab
- Green Thread Experiment in .NET
-
Is .NET just miles ahead or am I delusional?
There was a "green thread" experiment for dotnet a while ago, here is the conclusion: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
-
Why choose async/await over threads?
Experiment result write-up: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/e69dda51c7d796b812...
TLDR: The green threads experiment was a failure as it found (expected and obvious) issues that the Java applications are now getting to enjoy, joining their Go colleagues, while also requiring breaking changes. It, however, gave inspiration to subsequent re-examination of current async/await implementation and whether it can be improved by moving state machine generation and execution away from IL completely to runtime. It was a massive success as evidenced by preliminary overhead estimations in the results.
-
Garnet – A new remote cache-store from Microsoft Research
Yeah, it kind of is. There are quite a few of experiments that are conducted to see if they show promise in the prototype form and then are taken further for proper integration if they do.
Unfortunately, object stack allocation was not one of them even though DOTNET_JitObjectStackAllocation configuration knob exists today, enabling it makes zero impact as it almost never kicks in. By the end of the experiment[0], it was concluded that before investing effort in this kind of feature becomes profitable given how a lot of C# code is written, there are many other lower hanging fruits.
To contrast this, in continuation to green threads experiment, a runtime handled tasks experiment[1] which moves async state machine handling from IL emitted by Roslyn to special-cased methods and then handling purely in runtime code has been a massive success and is now being worked on to be integrated in one of the future version of .NET (hopefully 10?)
[0] https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/11192
[1] https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/async2-exp...
-
Java virtual threads hit with pinning issue
Unlike these folks from dotnet, which tested directly on ASP for real workload
https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398?darkschemeovr=1
-
Ask HN: Do we have evidence that green threading is faster than OS threads?
[1] https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
-
JEP Draft – Derived Record Creation (Preview) – Java
The only way to avoid it is to not build on top of Java or not adding any features on top of Java.
> To give another example with C#, there has been a lot of recent discussion about finding potential alternatives to their async-await concurrency model. They cite the level of effort it takes to maintain the async await style code and the costs that come from this.
I had a very different take-away. They did PoC with virtual threads and decided it's not worth the switch now and async-await that they have is good enough.
https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
> Some of the languages it gets compared too aren't even that old yet.
C# is old enough to drink and Scala just had its 20th birthday this week :)
-
.NET 8 – .NET Blog
It was tried and the dotnet team decided to drop it: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
-
.NET Green Thread Experiment Results
Technical details here: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/green-thre...
-
Thread-per-Core
Just last month .NET ended a green threading experiment, mainly because the overhead it adds to FFI was too high:
https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
Rust had green threads until late 2014, and they were removed because of their impact on performance.
Everyone has done the basic research: green threading is a convenient abstraction that comes with certain performance trade offs. It doesn't work for the kind of profile that Rust is trying to target.
What are some alternatives?
DalamudPlugins - This repository hosts plugins for XIVLauncher/Dalamud
.NET Runtime - .NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.
Shovel-Ash258 - Personal Shovel bucket with a wide variety of applications of all kinds.
DNNE - Prototype native exports for a .NET Assembly.
rust-opendingux-test - OpenGL on RG350M demo
.NET-Obfuscator - Lists of .NET Obfuscator (Free, Freemium, Paid and Open Source )
wix3 - WiX Toolset v3.x
FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project
Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows.
csharplang - The official repo for the design of the C# programming language
Scoop-Core - Shovel. Alternative, more advanced, and user-friendly implementation of windows command-line installer scoop.
Cocona - Micro-framework for .NET console application. Cocona makes it easy and fast to build console applications on .NET.