SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Top 16 macbook-pro Open-Source Projects
-
I find the Touch Bar to be a brilliant idea, but the released execution didn't live up to the potential.
https://pock.app
https://community.folivora.ai/t/goldenchaos-btt-the-complete...
https://github.com/niw/HapticKey
-
InfluxDB
Purpose built for real-time analytics at any scale. InfluxDB Platform is powered by columnar analytics, optimized for cost-efficient storage, and built with open data standards.
-
Unshaky
A software attempt to address the "double key press" issue on Apple's butterfly keyboard [not actively maintained]
-
-
That said, displays can technically go beyond the maximum (after all, it already does for HDR contents). It's "possible" in the sense people can do it. https://github.com/niklasr22/BrightIntosh
-
macbook12-spi-driver
Input driver for the SPI touchpad / keyboard found in the 12" MacBook (MacBook8,1 + MacBook9,1) and 2016 through 2018 Macbook Pro's (MacBookPro13,* and 14,*); a Touch Bar driver is also available. (by roadrunner2)
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
Project mention: Docker Performance Evaluation Across Operating Systems | news.ycombinator.com | 2024-08-27
This "performance evaluation" is seriously flawed. I don't see how the results presented can be interpreted in any meaningful way.
> This barrier could be overcome with the help of the T2-Ubuntu [32] distribution, designed to be installed on Apple computers with T2-chipped.
That reference leads to https://github.com/t2linux/T2-Debian-and-Ubuntu-Kernel?tab=r..., which provides instructions on how to use a non-Ubuntu kernel to work around a hardware support issue on the particular hardware they used.
So they didn't actually test Ubuntu at all. They tested a third party produced kernel hack used to get support for their hardware. They then falsely assume that this is somehow representative of running Docker in...what? Production? Or for development purposes? They seem to have neglected to think about their use case. You'd think that the hardware they used for this test would be representative of a developer use case - but then why does performance matter?
If you consider container technology of the form that Docker uses, the kernel used is paramount for performance. Host OS userspace doesn't matter since it isn't active - the container userspace is provided by the container!
So not using an official Ubuntu kernel means that they didn't actually test anything provided by Ubuntu at all in practice. They've just tested whatever Linux kernel Docker Desktop uses inside its VMs on Windows and macOS against this Linux kernel hack running natively.
Their abstract also says:
> Upon analyzing the distribution of Docker Desktop for Windows and Docker Desktop for macOS, it was discovered that running the Docker environment on these requires a lightweight virtual machine that emulates the Linux system.
This is inherently known to anyone who can remotely claim to understand container technology. If this was a revelation to them, then this would explain why they think they tested Ubuntu when they didn't, and why they were unable to spot this flaw.
Disclosure: I'm biased in favour of Ubuntu. But I think the flaws I've described above stand for themselves.
-
-
-
BrightXDR
Free and Open Source alternative to Vivid macOS application to extend Apple XDR display brightness from 500 up to 1600 nits.
-
-
-
xdr-tuner
Adjust the white point, gamma or make your XDR display darker without losing HDR peak luminance or the ability to adjust display brightness
-
-
apple-developer-wallpapers
Desktop wallpapers for Apple developers based on "Colours" available on MacOs.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
macbook-pro discussion
macbook-pro related posts
-
Dynamicland 2024
-
MacBook Pro M2 pro Chip vs MacBook Pro M3 pro chip
-
Just bought MBP 2018
-
Help please. I cant get the touch bar for my Macbook pro 2016 to work
-
Fedora 38 on a 2010 MacBook pro
-
Fedora can’t boot
-
Today I learned this exists
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 11 Sep 2024
Index
What are some of the best open-source macbook-pro projects? This list will help you:
Project | Stars | |
---|---|---|
1 | pock | 10,093 |
2 | Unshaky | 3,011 |
3 | mbp-2016-linux | 2,081 |
4 | mbp-fedora | 325 |
5 | BrightIntosh | 267 |
6 | macbook12-spi-driver | 250 |
7 | linux-mbp-arch | 176 |
8 | T2-Debian-and-Ubuntu-Kernel | 137 |
9 | TouchBarPong | 135 |
10 | MuseBar | 93 |
11 | BrightXDR | 90 |
12 | macbook | 49 |
13 | apple-bce-arch | 26 |
14 | xdr-tuner | 23 |
15 | nixos-overlay | 20 |
16 | apple-developer-wallpapers | 6 |