SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Abi-aa Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to abi-aa
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
luigi
Luigi is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
abi-aa reviews and mentions
-
LKM Relocation ressources
As far as I know, kernel modules are ordinary relocatable ELF executables, so the best resource will be the ELF specifications. The ARM-specific parts can be found here.
-
Cortex M7: get MSP using inline _asm algorithm checkup
Yes, that would be the case when your code's entry-point executes, and from then on it is your responsibility to maintain the alignment. It has nothing to do with AHB. This advisory has some examples of what can go wrong if your stack isn't 8-byte aligned. The alignment does not make much of a difference in your little function, but it's something to keep in mind as you write more complex code.
-
Raspberry Pi Pico: What is this obfuscated code(?) doing in its boot ROM?
Normally you'd save more than just PC as AAPCS (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs32/aap...) mandates stack to be aligned to 8 bytes for "public interface" functions. But this is is not a "public" function so it's fine to only save lr here.
"bx lr" is only used on it's own when the function doesn't call another function (altering lr), and doesn't need to save any registers.
If you see pop {lr}; bx lr then that's code that's being compiled to explicitly support Armv4 (e.g. Arm7TDMI)
-
What can I expect to happen if I print a character above CHAR_MAX?
The Arm Procedure Call Standards have "Arm C and C++ Language Mappings" sections that all say char is an "unsigned byte".
- Details on brk #imm implementation ?
-
This Week in Rust #412
eabi: many pages in this official ARM repository define it as "An ABI suited to the needs of embedded, and deeply embedded (sometimes called free standing), applications." It seems to be the name of an ABI, or maybe the ABI, that code compiled for ARM chips is expected to use? Except there's also AEABI, the first A stands for ARM, and that's something different? ARM's naming conventions confuse me endlessly.
-
Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers
Latest versions of the ABI specifications linked in the Machine Specific section
ARM: https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/releases
x86-64: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI (go to most recent CI job and download artifacts for a compiled PDF)
-
PyPy Project looking for sponsorship to add support for Apple Silicon
> Apple changed some things that impact PyPy, like the register uses and ffi calling conventions.
I thought everyone who used 64-bit ARM used ARM's AAPCS64 (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/master/aapcs64/a...), so the register usage and FFI calling convention should be the same as on Linux and Windows. What did Apple do that would affect the PyPy JIT?
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 24 Apr 2024
Stats
ARM-software/abi-aa is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of abi-aa is HTML.
Sponsored