SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Webext-signed-pages Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to webext-signed-pages
-
awesome-selfhosted
A list of Free Software network services and web applications which can be hosted on your own servers
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
Tutanota makes encryption easy
Tuta is an email service with a strong focus on security and privacy that lets you encrypt emails, contacts and calendar entries on all your devices.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
webclient
Discontinued Angular webclient (with Linux, macOS and Windows desktop clients) for CTemplar's encrypted email service. (by CTemplar)
-
-
pacman-bintrans
Experimental pacman integration for Reproducible Builds and Binary Transparency (with sigstore/rekor)
-
-
-
-
-
-
leCrypt-web-extension
leCrypt is a decentralised password manager which is cross-platform, free and secure.
-
meta-code-verify
Code Verify is an open source web browser extension that confirms that your Facebook, Messenger, Instagram, and WhatsApp Web code hasn’t been tampered with or altered, and that the Web experience you’re getting is the same as everyone else’s.
-
webext-signed-pages discussion
webext-signed-pages reviews and mentions
-
E2EE on the web: is the web that bad?
There is "Signed Pages" by the debeloper of EteSync. It is a browser extension, that checks webapps based on signatures in the html file. The addon then warns the user if the signature is not correct or - if I remember correctly - the source changed. This allows you to be sure what webapp code was delivered. But it seems like it did not really get used outside of his own projects. https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages
-
Cloudflare and CDNs - call for community opinions
EteSync has implemented something called Signed Pages, this might be worth looking closer at. This uses PGP keys which is preloaded into the browser; but I suspect that will be a barrier too high for most non-tech users.
- Is there any tool to verify client-side website code you get served is the same as the open source version?
-
Truly safe?
There are also projects like signed web pages which can also help increasing the trust level to some degree. But that requires that you can download the source code and regenerate the verification hash locally - or have other trusted methods to verify the hash value hasn't been modified as well. The current concept is reasonably sane, but it requires too much from users currently to make it widely used.
- A browser that verifies Javascript
-
Security experts declare all Proton apps secure after security audit
> The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads
True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different).
In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers don't natively have a nice way of pinning specific versions of a web app, but there is the clever hack of SecureBookmarks[0] (if you're prepared to sacrifice the UX), or, more realistically, you can pin the web app version using some sort of browser extension.
Examples of the latter include the Signed Pages extension[1], and Code Verify[2], which is the result of a collaboration between Meta and Cloudflare (for securing the WhatsApp Web code, currently, but should eventually support other sites like Proton's too). Of course, it would be much better if this capability was natively included in browsers themselves, but hopefully adoption of this technology will pressure browsers and standards bodies to take ownership of this.
[0] https://coins.github.io/secure-bookmark/
[1] https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages
[2] https://github.com/facebookincubator/meta-code-verify
-
ProtonMail Is Inherently Insecure, Your Emails Are Likely Compromised
Something like a browser extension for this does already exist, fortunately:
https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages
-
"Were you able to subpoena ProtonMail?"
In regards to untrusted webapp, yes, that is a reasonable attack vector. That said, I've heard from ProtonMail they have been considering to implement Signed Pages to help mitigate (at least some of the) issues with this attack vector.
-
Proton’s priorities
Which is why it is important to get proper E2E encryption on e-mail, where the source is open source and can be audited. And then that there are verify mechanisms to verify that the source code has not been manipulated. For web services there are signed-pages which is quite interesting.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 18 Jan 2025
Stats
tasn/webext-signed-pages is an open source project licensed under BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of webext-signed-pages is JavaScript.
Popular Comparisons
- webext-signed-pages VS photos-app
- webext-signed-pages VS mailvelope
- webext-signed-pages VS frame
- webext-signed-pages VS leCrypt-web-extension
- webext-signed-pages VS pacman-bintrans
- webext-signed-pages VS proton-mail
- webext-signed-pages VS termpair
- webext-signed-pages VS ios-mail
- webext-signed-pages VS oauth-1.0a
- webext-signed-pages VS web-extension