SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Verona Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to verona
-
Nim
Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
ponyc
Pony is an open-source, actor-model, capabilities-secure, high performance programming language
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
swift-corelibs-foundation
The Foundation Project, providing core utilities, internationalization, and OS independence
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
verona discussion
verona reviews and mentions
-
Snmalloc: A Message Passing Allocator
According to this FAQ, snmalloc was designed for the Verona language:
https://microsoft.github.io/verona/faq.html
Unfortunately, I cannot find any significant code samples for Verona on the website or in the GitHub repo. There are a few types defined in a pretty low-level way:
https://github.com/microsoft/verona/tree/master/std/builtin
- Microsoft Project Verona, a research programming language
-
Making C++ Safe Without Borrow Checking, Reference Counting, or Tracing GC
I think the future lies in figuring out how to get the benefits of that secret sauce, while mitigating or avoiding the downsides.
Like Boats said, the borrow checker works really well with data, but not so well with resources. I'd also add that it works well with data transformation, but struggles with abstraction, both the good and bad kind. It works well with tree-shaped data, but struggles with programs where the data has more intra-relationships.
So if we can design some paradigms that can harness Rust's borrow checker's benefits without its drawbacks, that could be pretty stellar. Some promising directions off the top of my head:
* Vale-style "region borrowing" [0] layered on top of a more flexible mutably-aliasing model, either involving single-threaded RC (like in Nim) generational references (like in Vale).
* Forty2 [1] or Verona [2] isolation, which let us choose between arenas and GC for isolated subgraphs. Combining that with some annotations could be a real home run. I think Cone [3] was going in this direction for a while.
* Val's simplified borrowing (mutable value semantics) combined with some form of mutable aliasing (this might sound familiar).
[0] https://verdagon.dev/blog/zero-cost-borrowing-regions-part-1... (am author)
[1] http://forty2.is/
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/verona
[3] https://cone.jondgoodwin.com/
-
A Flexible Type System for Fearless Concurrency
Their approach lines up pretty well with how we do regions in Vale. [0]
Specifically, we consider the "spine" of a linked list to be in a separate "region" than the elements. This lets us freeze the spine, while keeping the elements mutable.
This mechanism is particularly promising because it likely means one can iterate over a collection with zero run-time overhead, without the normal restrictions of a more traditional Rust/Cyclone-like borrow checker. We'll know for sure when we finish part 3 (one-way isolation [1]); part 1 landed in the experimental branch only a few weeks ago.
The main difference between Vale and the paper's approach is that Vale doesn't assume that all elements are self-isolated fields, Vale allows references between elements and even references to the outside world. However, this does mean that Vale sometimes needs "region annotations", whereas the paper's system doesn't need any annotations at all, and that's a real strength of their method.
Other languages are experimenting with regions too, such as Forty2 [2] and Verona [3] though they're leaning more towards a garbage-collection-based approach.
Pretty exciting time for languages!
[0] https://verdagon.dev/blog/zero-cost-borrowing-regions-overvi...
[1] https://verdagon.dev/blog/zero-cost-borrowing-regions-part-3...
[2] http://forty2.is/
[3] https://github.com/microsoft/verona
- Microsoft is rewriting core Windows libraries in Rust
-
Microsoft is to enable Rust use for Windows 11 kernel
Does this count? https://microsoft.github.io/verona/
-
Microsoft rewriting core Windows libraries in Rust
What about new Rust that "Microsoft Research" trying to "explore" https://github.com/microsoft/verona/blob/master/docs/explore.md ?
- Concurrent ownership in Verona
- Concurrent Ownership in Verona
-
Pony Programming Language
Fun fact: the person who created Pony, Sylvan Clebsch, has been working on a Microsoft Research project called Verona. From it's README [0]:
> Project Verona is a research programming language to explore the concept of concurrent ownership. We are providing a new concurrency model that seamlessly integrates ownership.
https://github.com/microsoft/verona/tree/master
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 22 Mar 2025
Stats
microsoft/verona is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of verona is C++.