tokio-uring

An io_uring backed runtime for Rust (by tokio-rs)

Tokio-uring Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to tokio-uring

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better tokio-uring alternative or higher similarity.

tokio-uring reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of tokio-uring. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-13.
  • tokio_fs crate
    2 projects | /r/rust | 13 Jul 2023
  • Use io_uring for network I/O
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Apr 2023
    While Mio will probably not implement uring in its current design, there's https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio-uring if you want to use io_uring in Rust.

    It's still in development, but the Tokio team seems intent on getting good io_uring support at least!

    As the README states, the Rust implementation requires a kernel newer than the one that shipped with Ubuntu 20.04 so I think it'll be a while before we'll see significant development among major libraries.

  • Create a data structure for low latency memory management
    4 projects | /r/rust | 4 Dec 2022
    That's what the pool is for: https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio-uring/blob/master/src/buf/fixed/pool.rs
  • Cloudflare Ditches Nginx for In-House, Rust-Written Pingora
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Sep 2022
    Tokio supports io_uring (https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio-uring), so perhaps when it's mature and battle-tested, it'd be easier to transition to it if Cloudflare aren't using it already.
  • Anyone using io_uring?
    8 projects | /r/rust | 18 Aug 2022
    - Tokio suffers from a similar problem
  • redb 0.4.0: 2x faster commits with 1PC+C instead of 2PC
    5 projects | /r/rust | 26 Jul 2022
    Eg via tokio-uring.
  • Efficient way to read multiple files in parallel
    3 projects | /r/rust | 8 Jun 2022
    I strongly recommend you to look into io-uring and use async executors that take advantages of it: - tokio-uring (not recommended as it is still undergoing development) - monoio - glommio
  • Stacked Futures and why they are impossible
    1 project | /r/rust | 8 Jun 2022
    This is my thinking as well. Specifically, I realized that if you don’t use tasks, but rather futures and join, than structured concurrency just works out (at the cost of less efficient poll). In a single-threaded/thread-per-core runtime, tasks could have the same semantics as futures. Somewhat elaborated here: https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio-uring/issues/81
  • How to use async Rust for non-IO tasks?
    2 projects | /r/rust | 20 Apr 2022
    There's a new API on Linux called io_uring that has performance benefits, but most executors don't use it yet, except executors meant specifically to harness the power of io_uring like tokio-uring and Glommio
  • Side effects of Tokio
    1 project | /r/rust | 19 Apr 2022
    Breaking it down a bit further- Rust's async is zero-cost, and there's no way to write faster equivalent code to the language construct in Rust (and presumably other LLVM languages). Tokio introduces abstractions over OS APIs (indirectly) and provides a runtime. The runtime isn't zero cost, but it is likely to be better optimized for "standard" situations than a homebrewed solution, and its primary competition is in the form of other large async runtimes. On the other hand, Tokio's IO routines are (AFAIK) about as well written as one can get with blocking OS APIs, and the only competitors in that space are projects like tokio-uring that use APIs more well suited for asynchronous usage.
  • A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
    www.saashub.com | 25 Apr 2024
    SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →

Stats

Basic tokio-uring repo stats
28
998
4.1
about 2 months ago

Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com