InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now. Learn more →
Swift-corelibs-foundation Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to swift-corelibs-foundation
-
-
InfluxDB
InfluxDB – Built for High-Performance Time Series Workloads. InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now.
-
-
-
Introducing .NET Multi-platform App UI (MAUI)
.NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.
-
-
-
swift-evolution
This maintains proposals for changes and user-visible enhancements to the Swift Programming Language.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
reactjs.org
Discontinued The React documentation website [Moved to: https://github.com/reactjs/react.dev]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tokamak
SwiftUI-compatible framework for building browser apps with WebAssembly and native apps for other platforms
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
swift-corelibs-foundation discussion
swift-corelibs-foundation reviews and mentions
-
Handling Cookies Is a Minefield
Re Safari’s networking code being closed source, a good substitute might be the Swift port of Foundation. You can see checks for control and delete characters here: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-corelibs-foundation/blob/...
-
Apple didn't fix Swift's biggest flaw
I'm not deep in Swift, but this would make it seem Foundation is open source: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/tree/main
-
Mixing Swift and C++
a : https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/blob/main...
I wouldn't want to be the guy relying on this table advancement for this project. The fact that they're rewriting it in pure swift probably says a lot about the quality of the current approach.
b: makes absolutely no difference from a developer perspective. if you want to run threads in swift you're going to use gcd.
c: my take with all apple software tech has been to wait until they've dogfooded their own tech long enough to make it useable. Worked very well for me so far, thank you very much.
- Roast my supposedly impressive iOS developer resume
-
Apple Announces Full Swift Rewrite of the Foundation Framework
Correction: rewrite of PARTS of Foundation
There already was an open-source project to rewrite ALL of foundation, but it had stalled on the shores of having to re-implement everything:
https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation
-
Apple's Swift rewrite of its Foundation framework will be open source
The (shitty) old Linux implementation has been on GitHub for years.
-
There is no “software supply chain”
Sigh... The traditional argument is that every dependency is of the same quality and trustworthiness of the language Standard Library.
If I use the SL, then I should also have no problem using some lashed-up chimera that has a dependency hierarchy that spans three continents.
Like I said, I'll do things my way.
For the record, here's a peek at some of the "worthless" packages that I use in my own work: https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware
Also, for the record, here's the Swift Foundation Library: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation
It has plenty of open issues: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/issues
If every dependency chain can match these, yhen I'll be open to considering them.
As it is, I do use the occasional external package, but I'm picky.
-
A Completely Open-Source Implementation of Apple Code Signing and Notarization
CoreFoundation is (partially?) open-source and cross-platform now: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation
-
Show HN: Particles – the URL contains the whole program code
Partly this is doable because although RFC 2616 specifies a max URL length of 2048 bytes, most browsers allow much longer, with Chrome and Firefox allowing at least 64k chars (that's what they'll display but it seems like more is happily processed), while Safari allows URL strings up to 2GB in size[1]!
[1] https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/blob/b23d...
-
What is missing in the Swift ecosystem?
Regarding your point #3, Swift does indeed have an open-source cross-platform implementation of Foundation. swift-corelibs-foundation
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 19 May 2025
Stats
swiftlang/swift-corelibs-foundation is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of swift-corelibs-foundation is C.
Popular Comparisons
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS google-api-objectivec-client-for-rest
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS Publish
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS Unwrap
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS JWM
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS swift
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS gon
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS chapel
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS attestation
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS Introducing .NET Multi-platform App UI (MAUI)
- swift-corelibs-foundation VS Mutata-Showcase-App