Sml-parseq Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to sml-parseq

futhark

52 2,283 9.8 Haskell sml-parseq VS futhark

:boom::computer::boom: A data-parallel functional programming language
sml-analyzer

1 23 0.0 Rust sml-parseq VS sml-analyzer

An experimental language server for SomewhatML
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
apltail

6 208 1.8 Standard ML sml-parseq VS apltail

APL Compiler targeting a typed array intermediate language
LunarML

3 240 9.1 Standard ML sml-parseq VS LunarML

The Standard ML compiler that produces Lua/JavaScript
mlton

9 912 8.5 Standard ML sml-parseq VS mlton

The MLton repository
install-mlkit

1 5 3.9 Standard ML sml-parseq VS install-mlkit

Action for installing MLKit
smlnj-viscomp-example

1 4 0.0 Standard ML sml-parseq VS smlnj-viscomp-example

An example of how to use SML/NJ's Visible Compiler APIs
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
mlkit

2 264 7.7 Standard ML sml-parseq VS mlkit

Standard ML Compiler and Toolkit (by melsman)

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better sml-parseq alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to sml-parseq

sml-parseq reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of sml-parseq. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-14.

Provably Space-Efficient Parallel Functional Programming
2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 14 Jan 2022

Author here. One of the cool things about the property we're using here---disentanglement---is that it specifically allows for shared data, under only mild restrictions. This allows us, for example, to implement fast libraries which utilize shared mutable state for efficiency under the hood. A good example is our parallel arrays library (https://github.com/shwestrick/sml-parseq), which is "purely functional" in terms of its interface, but not its implementation.
It's helpful here to distinguish parallelism from concurrency. Disentanglement naturally emerges in data-race-free parallel programs, which have no concurrency. But certainly, you bring up a good point for programs that are highly concurrent in addition to being highly parallel. There's lots of work already on concurrent functional programming, for example CML (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrent_ML), and we think these ideas could be adapted to work with disentanglement really well.