Should Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to should

xUnit

36 4,010 9.2 C# should VS xUnit

xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
Shouldly

4 1,970 6.8 C# should VS Shouldly

Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
Fluent Assertions

7 3,585 9.6 C# should VS Fluent Assertions

A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
GennyMcGenFace

0 3 0.0 C# should VS GennyMcGenFace
NFluent

0 308 5.6 C# should VS NFluent

Smooth your .NET TDD experience with NFluent! NFluent is an ergonomic assertion library which aims to fluent your .NET TDD experience (based on simple Check.That() assertion statements). NFluent aims your tests to be fluent to write (with a super-duper-happy 'dot' auto-completion experience), fluent to read (i.e. as close as possible to plain English expression), but also fluent to troubleshoot, in a less-error-prone way comparing to the classical .NET test frameworks. NFluent is also directly i
Stryker.NET

14 1,707 9.4 C# should VS Stryker.NET

Mutation testing for .NET core and .NET framework!
Machine.Specifications

1 883 4.0 C# should VS Machine.Specifications

Machine.Specifications is a Context/Specification framework for .NET that removes language noise and simplifies tests.
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
NSubstitute

11 2,545 7.4 C# should VS NSubstitute

A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.
Compare-Net-Objects

1 1,024 7.0 C# should VS Compare-Net-Objects

What you have been waiting for :+1: Perform a deep compare of any two .NET objects using reflection. Shows the differences between the two objects.
Xunit.Gherkin.Quick

2 190 0.0 C# should VS Xunit.Gherkin.Quick

BDD in .NET Core - using Xunit and Gherkin (compatible with both .NET Core and .NET)
CoreBDD

1 18 10.0 C# should VS CoreBDD

BDD framework for xUnit.net
xunit-bdd

1 13 10.0 C# should VS xunit-bdd

Small BDD Framework built on top of xUnit
xunit-spec

1 5 10.0 C# should VS xunit-spec

Specification testing for xunit
NUnit

26 2,453 9.2 C# should VS NUnit

NUnit Framework
SaaSHub

www.saashub.com sponsored

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better should alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to should

should reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of should. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-01.

NUnit vs XUnit for .net6+ microservices
7 projects | /r/dotnet | 1 Mar 2023

On a side note, something I would highly recommend NOT doing is using the built in assertion types for any of the test adapters. Without a doubt the hardest part of switching unit test frameworks is having to fix all your assertions which is why we use 3rd party assertions. The built-in assertions also tend to not be very feature rich and don't have the most helpful messages. We personally use FluentAssertions, but there are other options such as Shoudly or Should. I highly recommend picking one of them over the built in assertions. You will thank yourself later :)