discord-plays-pokemon

Twitch Plays Pokémon, but for Discord (by shepherdjerred)

Discord-plays-pokemon Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to discord-plays-pokemon

  1. just

    🤖 Just a command runner

  2. CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

    CodeRabbit logo
  3. makesure

    Simple task/command runner with declarative goals and dependencies

  4. macos-cross-compiler

    Compile binaries for macOS on Linux

  5. .files

    No place like ~ (by matheusmoreira)

  6. just-flake

    Use `just` in your Nix devShells with re-usable and share-able targets.

  7. vnc-lm

    A Discord bot for large language models. Add Gemini, Sonnet-3.7 DeepSeek R-1, and other models. Easily change models, edit prompts, and enable web search.

  8. evobot

    🤖 EvoBot is a Discord Music Bot built with TypeScript + Discord.js, includes Docker builds & localization in 20+ languages

  9. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better discord-plays-pokemon alternative or higher similarity.

discord-plays-pokemon discussion

Log in or Post with

discord-plays-pokemon reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of discord-plays-pokemon. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-27.
  • I stopped worrying and loved Makefiles
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Apr 2024
    Make is excellent if you use it properly to model your dependencies. This works really well for languages like C/C++, but I think Make really struggles with languages like Go, JavaScript, and Python or when your using a large combination of technologies.

    I've found Earthly [0] to be the _perfect_ tool to replace Make. It's a familiar syntax (combination of Dockerfiles + Makefiles). Every target is run in an isolated Docker container, and each target can copy files from other targets. This allows Earthly to perform caching and parallelization for free, and in addition you get lots of safety with containerization. I've been using Earthly for a couple of years now and I love it.

    Some things I've built with it:

    * At work [1], we use it to build Docker images for E2E testing. This includes building a Go project, our mkdocs documentation, our Vue UI, and a ton of little scripts all over the place for generating documentation, release notes, dependency information (like the licenses of our deps), etc.

    * I used it to create my macOS cross compiler project [2].

    * A project for playing a collaborative game of Pokemon on Discord [3]

    IMO Makefiles are great if you have a few small targets. If you're looking at more than >50 lines, if your project uses many languages, or you need to run targets in a Docker container, then Earthly is a great choice.

    [0]: https://earthly.dev/

    [1]: https://p3m.dev/

    [2]: https://github.com/shepherdjerred/macos-cross-compiler

    [3]: https://github.com/shepherdjerred/discord-plays-pokemon

Stats

Basic discord-plays-pokemon repo stats
1
5
5.4
9 months ago

shepherdjerred/discord-plays-pokemon is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 only which is an OSI approved license.

The primary programming language of discord-plays-pokemon is TypeScript.


Sponsored
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai

Did you know that TypeScript is
the 1st most popular programming language
based on number of references?