SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Shake Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to shake
-
zig
General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
-
ripgrep
ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
-
Rust-for-Linux
Adding support for the Rust language to the Linux kernel. (by Rust-for-Linux)
-
-
buildroot
Buildroot, making embedded Linux easy. Note that this is not the official repository, but only a mirror. The official Git repository is at http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/. Do not open issues or file pull requests here.
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
shake-language-c
Cross-compilation framework based on the Shake Haskell library.
-
-
bumper
Haskell tool to automatically bump package versions transitively. (by silkapp)
-
-
-
fancy-regex
Rust library for regular expressions using "fancy" features like look-around and backreferences
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
shake reviews and mentions
-
Ninja is enough build system
Another interesting implementation is Shake: https://shakebuild.com/
It is technically a Haskell DSL, but supports Ninja files, time estimates and has tools for linting and profiling.
-
Buck2: Our open source build system
They explicitly refer to Shake build system and Build Systems a la Carte paper.
-
Straightforward Makefile Tutorial that bring together best practices once and for all.
The one paper that gave me hope about build systems was Build systems à la carte: Theory and practice, by Andrey Mokhov, Neil Mitchell, and Simon Peyton Jones. Among other things, it describes the theoretical underpinnings of the Shake build system. To be honest I believe any build system that ignores the maths described in this paper can safely be ignored. (You may however ignore the paper itself if the maths checks out. See Daniel J. Bernstein's redo, which matches Shake very closely.)
-
Worst language you ever used? Really used not just looked at the manual.
Yeah, they don't have to be terrible. I haven't used it, but people in my circles tend to really like Shake, which uses a Haskell embedded DSL to describe builds.
- Shake Build System
-
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats facing the GNU Autotools
You could try Shake. It's a sane build system written by a former co-worker of mine. https://shakebuild.com/
-
Overview of the CMake controversy, and break down the pros and cons of the critical C++ tool.
Shake does require compilation as it's essentially just a Haskell library providing a DSL and it works just fine, I guess in gradle's case it's a thing about Java-typical overengineering and complete blindness to resource usage. Shake's underlying engine can actually go head-to-head with ninja itself when building ninja files.
-
Need recommendations for a dependency-tracking system
Did you look at shake: https://shakebuild.com/ ?
- The Shake Build System
-
Trouble Linking Dynamic Library for Package
For reasons I don't want to get into, I am building my own GHC package without cabal. The documentation is a little sketchy, but I've succeeded in build and installing it in my own user database (I'm on linux x86_64, using GHC 8.6.5). I am using shake to do all of this, and I've been pretty pleased with how it works.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 18 Apr 2024
Stats
ndmitchell/shake is an open source project licensed under BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of shake is Haskell.