rweb

Yet another web server framework for rust (by kdy1)

Rweb Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to rweb

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better rweb alternative or higher similarity.

rweb reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of rweb. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-06-23.
  • Is there a Flask like library for Rust?
    3 projects | /r/rust | 23 Jun 2021
    rweb is pretty simple. it's based on warp, but with rocket-like #[get("/product/{id}")] which is like Flask's @app.route("/product/").
  • A web framework I desperately wish there was a Rust equivalent for: FastAPI
    6 projects | /r/rust | 7 Mar 2021
    I wrote a PR this weekend to give FastAPI like UX to rweb! https://github.com/kdy1/rweb/pull/56
  • Replacing FastAPI with Rust: Part 3 - Trying Actix
    8 projects | dev.to | 12 Jan 2021
    This crate has an implementation for the Handler trait which I used to model my own Handler trait for an actix-web Service. Using my own struct which implemented that trait suddenly made the "this is not Send" error messages simple enough to decipher. I was able to get the thing to actually compile, but it required using a few unwrap()s on errors which were not Send. I could probably go back and figure out how to wrap or map those errors to something simpler to make my implementation less fragile, but I was already annoyed enough at this implementation that I was headed toward rweb anyway.
  • Replacing FastAPI with Rust: Part 2 - Research
    7 projects | dev.to | 1 Jan 2021
    All of that is to say rweb is a possible solution, but not a likely one. The product seems great, and if the code functions as well as the brief examples indicate, this is the best option from a code perspective (oops, spoilers!). Given my concerns about the community, I would have to be comfortable forking and maintaining my own version of this framework in the event that I need changes and can't wait months for a PR to be reviewed. Even if that's not the case, I'll certainly have to write much more complete documentation for my teammates to be able to use this project effectively. I'm not mortally opposed to any of that, but I'd rather avoid it if I can.
  • A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
    workos.com | 19 Apr 2024
    The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more →

Stats

Basic rweb repo stats
5
347
0.0
10 months ago
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com