Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries. Learn more →
Rust_serialization_benchmark Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to rust_serialization_benchmark
-
-
Nutrient
Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers. Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
-
-
argparse-benchmarks-rs
Discontinued Collected benchmarks for arg parsing crates written in Rust [Moved to: https://github.com/rosetta-rs/argparse-rosetta-rs]
-
-
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
rust_serialization_benchmark discussion
rust_serialization_benchmark reviews and mentions
-
Rkyv: Rkyv zero-copy deserialization framework for rust
https://github.com/djkoloski/rust_serialization_benchmark
Apache/arrow-rs: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs
From https://arrow.apache.org/faq/ :
> How does Arrow relate to Flatbuffers?
> Flatbuffers is a low-level building block for binary data serialization. It is not adapted to the representation of large, structured, homogenous data, and does not sit at the right abstraction layer for data analysis tasks.
> Arrow is a data layer aimed directly at the needs of data analysis, providing a comprehensive collection of data types required to analytics, built-in support for “null” values (representing missing data), and an expanding toolbox of I/O and computing facilities.
> The Arrow file format does use Flatbuffers under the hood to serialize schemas and other metadata needed to implement the Arrow binary IPC protocol, but the Arrow data format uses its own representation for optimal access and computation
-
Comfy Engine 0.3 - No Lifetimes, User Shaders, Text Rendering, 2.5D, LDTK
Nice that comfy gets even easier. Also, if serde's compile time is an issue, then there's nanoserde which is usually much much faster according to benchmarks
-
Müsli - An experimental binary serialization framework with more choice
A note on performance and size: Some benchmarks and statistics are included in the README. But only because people will be curious. I've based my methodology on rust_serialization_benchmark, but decided to not extend it (for now) since it seems to exclude any Rust types which are not widely supported by all formats being tested (like HashMap's and 128-bit numbers). The test suite is already quite nice if you want to take it for a spin.
-
bitcode 0.4 release - binary serialization format
While we haven't benchmarked either of those ourselves. You can checkout rust_serialization_benchmark which has protobuf under the name prost.
-
Announcing bitcode format for serde
Update: Benchmark PR submitted: https://github.com/djkoloski/rust_serialization_benchmark/pull/37
-
Best format for high-performance Serde?
Here is a speed and size benchmark of different rust binary serialization formats: https://github.com/djkoloski/rust_serialization_benchmark Warning: I think the creator of this benchmark is also the creator of rkyv, one of the best positioned formats in the benchmark.
-
Grammatical, automatic furigana with SQLite and Rust
So I assume you're deserializing them before processing the book? If so then if you want an easy speed-up you could also take a look at these benchmarks and pick a faster serialization crate. (: (Although you might or might not get a big speedup; depends on what exactly you're deserializing and how much you are deserializing.)
-
GitHub - epage/parse-benchmarks-rs
You can add the rust serialization benchmark to that list
-
The run-up to v1.0 for Postcard
Hey! Similar to bincode, it provides a very similar, compact binary format. The rkyv benchmark is the most comprehensive I'm aware of, but compared to bincode, postcard is generally a similar speed for serialization or deserialization (maybe a touch slower), but generally produces a slightly smaller "on the wire" size.
-
I made a blazing fast and small new data serialization format called "DLHN" in Rust.
You should add your crate to these benchmarks. (Which are, AFAIK, the most comprehensive set of benchmarks currently available for Rust serialization libraries.)
-
A note from our sponsor - Nutrient
www.nutrient.io | 19 Feb 2025
Stats
The primary programming language of rust_serialization_benchmark is Rust.
Popular Comparisons
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS bebop
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS rust-serialization-benchmarks
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS json-benchmark
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS parse-rosetta-rs
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS dlhn
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS unsafe-code-guidelines
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS tree-buf
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS rkyv
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS bitcode
- rust_serialization_benchmark VS mk48