The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more â
Rfcs Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to rfcs
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
enquirer
Stylish, intuitive and user-friendly prompts, for Node.js. Used by eslint, webpack, yarn, pm2, pnpm, RedwoodJS, FactorJS, salesforce, Cypress, Google Lighthouse, Generate, tencent cloudbase, lint-staged, gluegun, hygen, hardhat, AWS Amplify, GitHub Actions Toolkit, @airbnb/nimbus, and many others! Please follow Enquirer's author: https://github.com/jonschlinkert
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
harden-runner
Network egress filtering and runtime security for GitHub-hosted and self-hosted runners
-
discussions
Soliciting ideas and feedback for community driven collaborative projects that help Node. (by node-forward)
-
hagrid-container
Hagrid as in, "keeper of keys". Verifying OpenPGP keyserver, written in Rust. OCI image
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
rfcs reviews and mentions
-
Ruby Shield: Shopify donates $1M to stewards of rubygems, bundler
I can give a limited answer based on my own day-to-day work. I work in Ruby Dependency Security, which is the team who are most involved in helping out with rubygems.org and RubyGems work. Our biggest effort lately has been about rolling out MFA requirements for owners of top-most-downloaded gems. What I'd like to do afterwards is focus on gem signing using sigstore, which would make it a "one click" experience for authors. We did some work on it earlier this year[0] but chose to focus on MFA as our first big push. We also aim to devote a substantial fraction of our time to chopping wood and carrying water: looking at honeybadger exception reports, etc.
In terms of the long run there's a whole bunch that can be done to continuously harden every aspect of the Ruby supply chain. One thing we've been involved in founding is the OpenSSF Securing Software Repos working group[1], which has meant that RubyGems maintainers are now talking directly with folks from PyPI, npm, Maven Central, Cargo and others. We all face shared threats (eg, dependency confusion, resurrection attacks etc), so getting together to work collectively and share ideas has been super awesome.
[0] https://github.com/rubygems/rfcs/pull/37
[1] https://github.com/ossf/wg-securing-software-repos
-
Making popular Ruby packages more secure
Thatâs correct. If youâre a maintainer of a very popular gem, as of 15th August youâll no longer be able to e.g. `gem push` if you havenât enabled MFA on your RubyGems account. You will of course still be able to log in and enable it.
More details in the RFC: https://github.com/rubygems/rfcs/blob/master/text/0007-mfa-r...
-
NPM Vulnerability Discussion on Twitter
> < 10% had useful 2FA enabled.
I expect this to change. NPM will roll out mandatory MFA for the most-downloaded packages[0] (RubyGems as well[1]). I expect this will rise to a 100% requirement at some point because Github's decision to require MFA by the end of 2023 will massively raise the waterline of folks who have the capability to MFA and experience with MFA.
[0] https://github.blog/2021-11-15-githubs-commitment-to-npm-eco...
[1] https://github.com/rubygems/rfcs/issues/35
-
Sigstore
The RFC trying to introduce sigstore for RubyGems is an interesting look at this in practice: https://github.com/rubygems/rfcs/pull/37
- RFC for Sigstore Rubygems Signing
- RFC: Proposal for new signing mechanism
- Require MFA for most-used gems [RubyGems RFC]
-
A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
workos.com | 23 Apr 2024
Stats
Sponsored