reviewdog

🐶 Automated code review tool integrated with any code analysis tools regardless of programming language (by reviewdog)

Reviewdog Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to reviewdog

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better reviewdog alternative or higher similarity.

reviewdog reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of reviewdog. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-16.
  • Code reviews and Suggestions from SARIF report
    2 projects | dev.to | 16 May 2023
    I build a general converter from SARIF to Reviewdog Diagnostic Format (RDFormat), then use Reviewdog to give suggested code changes as well as the context of the changes for PR reviewing.
  • My CNCF LFX Mentorship Spring 2023 Project at Kubescape
    19 projects | dev.to | 14 May 2023
    I helped improve the Kubescape GitHub Actions fix suggestions code review process, where I created the workflow which works by collecting the SARIF (Static Analysis Results Interchange Format) file that kubescape generates. Then, with the help of HollowMan6/sarif4reviewdog, convert the SARIF file into RDFormat (Reviewdog Diagnostic Format) and generate reviews for code fix suggestions on GitHub Actions using Reviewdog. I also helped add the “fix" object support for the Kubescape-generated SARIF report.
  • Goast: Generic static analysis for Go Abstract Syntax Tree by OPA/Rego
    5 projects | dev.to | 12 Sep 2022
    Static analysis should be performed continuously by CI (Continuous Integration) to prevent unintentional inclusion of code. The JSON output schema is compatible with reviewdog and can be used as is in reviewdog.
  • reviewdog-gitlab-webhook: Trigger reviewdog checks for GitLab repo using webhooks
    2 projects | /r/golang | 12 Jul 2022
    Trigger reviewdog checks on a repository via GitLab webhook rather than CI job.
  • How to reuse steps in Tekton tasks
    5 projects | dev.to | 21 May 2022
    # parameters - op: add path: /spec/params/- value: name: report-file default: reportfile description: Report file with errors - op: add path: /spec/params/- value: name: format default: golint description: Format of error input from the task - op: add path: /spec/params/- value: name: reporter default: local description: Reporter type for reviewdog https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporters - op: add path: /spec/params/- value: name: diff default: git diff FETCH_HEAD description: Diff command https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporters # workspaces - op: add path: /spec/workspaces/- value: name: token description: | Workspace which contains a token file for Github Pull Request comments. Must have a token file with the Github API access token # steps - op: add path: /spec/steps/- value: name: reviewdog-report image: golangci/golangci-lint:v1.31-alpine # both have the same workspace name workingDir: $(workspaces.source.path) script: | #!/bin/sh set -ue wget -O - -q https://raw.githubusercontent.com/reviewdog/reviewdog/master/install.sh | sh -s -- -b $(go env GOPATH)/bin export REVIEWDOG_GITHUB_API_TOKEN=$(cat $(workspaces.token.path)/token) cat $(params.reportfile) | reviewdog -f=$(params.format) -diff="$(params.diff)"
  • I manage my dev.to blog in GitHub repository
    5 projects | dev.to | 4 May 2022
    In reference article, use prettier to format the markdown and the code snippets. I implement a text review using textlint and reviewdog in addition to that.
  • Automated code review for on-prem
    2 projects | /r/gitlab | 3 May 2022
    JetBrains Qodana is one option, but currently requires glue code to map the findings to MR comments. I'm using reviewdog for it but I'm hoping they'll eventually fix it to have native integration
  • Incident with GitHub Actions, Issues, Pull Requests, and Webhooks
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Oct 2021
    I used ReviewDog to wire in Qodana results, so I hear you about wishing it was built in, but it is achievable: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporter-gitlab-merge...

    Based on my contact with GitLab's built-in other scanning tools, I wouldn't trust their vuln management further than I could throw it, so you're likely not missing much on that front

  • Two Wishes for Dev Tooling
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Jul 2021
    You'll want to keep an eye on Qodana[0] which when combined with ReviewDog[1] (and some glue script since Qodana has its own snowflake output JSON that RD doesn't read natively; engineering!) can offer suggested changes on MR/PR platforms which support such a thing [2]

    I have the first two working together but not the last part yet, and Qodana is for sure a moving target but is what I've been praying for them to do for years now

    0: https://github.com/JetBrains/Qodana/blob/2021.2/topics/getti...

    1: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog

    2: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/revie...

  • A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
    www.saashub.com | 17 Apr 2024
    SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →

Stats

Basic reviewdog repo stats
12
7,329
9.4
5 days ago
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com