SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Regex-benchmark Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to regex-benchmark
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
-
Redis
Redis is an in-memory database that persists on disk. The data model is key-value, but many different kind of values are supported: Strings, Lists, Sets, Sorted Sets, Hashes, Streams, HyperLogLogs, Bitmaps.
-
v
Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io
-
-
-
-
sqlx
🧰 The Rust SQL Toolkit. An async, pure Rust SQL crate featuring compile-time checked queries without a DSL. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. (by launchbadge)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
super-expressive
🦜 Super Expressive is a zero-dependency JavaScript library for building regular expressions in (almost) natural language
-
regex
An implementation of regular expressions for Rust. This implementation uses finite automata and guarantees linear time matching on all inputs.
-
cyclone
:cyclone: A brand-new compiler that allows practical application development using R7RS Scheme. We provide modern features and a stable system capable of generating fast native binaries.
-
regex-benchmark discussion
regex-benchmark reviews and mentions
- Tcl 9.0.0 Released
-
Best regexp alternative for Go. Benchmarks. Plots.
Before we start comparing the aforementioned solutions, it is worth to show how bad things are with the standard regex library in Go. I found the project where the author compares the performance of standard regex engines of various languages. The point of this benchmark is to repeatedly run 3 regular expressions over a predefined text. Go came in 3rd place in this benchmark! From the end....
-
Rust vs. Go in 2023
* Let you clone a map without rehashing every key to a new seed. I generally measure at least 15x speedup from this alone, unlocking very useful design patterns like "clone a map and apply a few temporary updates for a one-off operation like validation or simulation" with no extra code complexity. Go gives you no better option than slowly rehashing the entire map.
And that's just hash maps. How about Go's regex engine being one of the slowest in the world while Rust's regex crate being one of the fastest:
https://github.com/mariomka/regex-benchmark#optimized
-
Regex for lazy developers
Languages Regex Benchmark
-
Elon is your new boss, time to refactor!
Java is still pretty bad compared to C# (not to mention Rust or Nim)
-
Lyra: Fast, in-memory, typo-tolerant, full-text search engine in TypeScript
https://github.com/mariomka/regex-benchmark
And the always interesting techempower Project, which leaves the implementation to participants of each round. https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r21&tes...
Choose whatever category you wish there, js is faster in then go in almost all categories there.
Even though I said it before, I'm going to repeat myself as I expect you to ignore my previous message: the language doesn't make any implementation fast or slow. You can have a well performing search engine in go, and JS. The performance difference will most likely not be caused by the language with these two choices. And the same will apply with C/Rust. The language won't make the engine performant creating a maximally performant search engine is hard
-
i'd like you to meet regex-
Also, regex engines are not created equally, at all. One of the best writeups I've ever read is from the ripgrep blog. Burntsushi knows regex. There's also this benchmark site which illustrates how general language performance is an entirely different metric than regex performance. Don't assume those benchmarks will cover your particular use case, though--different regex engines might handle your particular situation differently.
-
Go performance from version 1.2 to 1.18
Interesting. Looking at this repo, they have
Rust -> Ruby -> Java -> Golang
https://github.com/mariomka/regex-benchmark
Though it appears the numbers are two years old or so, and only for 3 specific regexes.
-
Hajime can now get hardware information about your MC server, all from Minecraft itself!
id also be careful in claiming C++ std regex is faster than python, unless you actually have proof. there's a ton of information that in many cases its actually slower. https://github.com/mariomka/regex-benchmark. have you actually benchmarked your code? or was it just a naive assumption that because its C++ its just fast?
-
A Complete Course of the Raku programming language
It is a matter of personal preference.
I find that regular expressions and text-wrangling tasks are faster and easier in Perl than in other programming languages due to its accessible syntax and regular expression engine speed.
This article shows the regular expression syntax in several popular programming languages: https://cs.lmu.edu/~ray/notes/regex/
This GitHub repo gives some regex performance test benchmarks: https://github.com/mariomka/regex-benchmark Perl is pretty fast among the scripting languages that were benchmarked.
If you are familiar with C / C++, then learning Perl is relatively fast and easy: https://perldoc.perl.org/perlintro
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 11 Oct 2024
Stats
mariomka/regex-benchmark is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of regex-benchmark is Dockerfile.