Collect, organize, and act on massive volumes of high-resolution data to power real-time intelligent systems. Learn more →
React-redux Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to react-redux
-
-
Civic Auth
Auth in Less Than 5 Minutes. Civic Auth comes with multiple SSO options, optional embedded wallets, and user management — all implemented with just a few lines of code. Start building today.
-
react-router
Discontinued Declarative routing for React [Moved to: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router] (by rackt)
-
-
-
react-redux-typescript-guide
The complete guide to static typing in "React & Redux" apps using TypeScript
-
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
react-router-redux
Discontinued Ruthlessly simple bindings to keep react-router and redux in sync [Moved to: https://github.com/reactjs/react-router-redux] (by rackt)
-
react-starter-kit
The web's most popular Jamstack front-end template (boilerplate) for building web applications with React
-
-
react-redux discussion
react-redux reviews and mentions
-
Animated page transitions in react
I'm using react/react-redux/react-router/react-router-redux.
-
Decoupling React Components and Redux Connect
Reactjs As seen here I am trying to decouple my app's components as much as I can and make them not aware of any storage or action creator. The goal is to have them to manage their own state and call functions to emit a change. I have been told that you do this using props. Considering // Menu.jsximport React from 'react'import { className } from './menu.scss'import Search from 'components/search'class Menu extends React.Component { render () { return ( Home foo bar ) }} And // Search.jsximport React from 'react'import { className } from './search.scss'class Search extends React.Component { render () { let { searchTerm, onSearch } = this.props return ( {searchTerm} onSearch(e.target.value)} value={searchTerm} /> ) }}Search.propTypes = { searchTerm: React.PropTypes.string, onSearch: React.PropTypes.function}export default Search And reading here I see a smart use of Provider and connect and my implementation would look something like this: import { bindActionCreators, connect } from 'redux'import actions from 'actions'function mapStateToProps (state) { return { searchTerm: state.searchTerm }}function mapDispatchToProps (dispatch) { return bindActionCreators({ dispatchSearchAction: actions.search }, dispatch)}export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(Search) Assuming I have a store handling searchTerm as part of the global state. Problem is, where does this code belongs to? If I put it in Search.jsx I will couple actions with the component and more important to redux. Am I supposed to have two different versions of my component, one decoupled and one connect()ed and have to use it? If yes what would my files tree look like? One file per component or a like a make-all-connected.js ? Answer link : https://codehunter.cc/a/reactjs/decoupling-react-components-and-redux-connect
-
What's the '@' (at symbol) in the Redux @connect decorator?
It is in fact a part of react-redux which is used to connects a React component to a Redux store.
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
influxdata.com | 27 Apr 2025
Stats
rackt/react-redux is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of react-redux is TypeScript.
Popular Comparisons
- react-redux VS oni
- react-redux VS react-redux-typescript-guide
- react-redux VS hospitalrun-frontend
- react-redux VS frontend-bootcamp
- react-redux VS rematch
- react-redux VS react-tap-event-plugin
- react-redux VS react-starter-kit
- react-redux VS react-redux
- react-redux VS react-router-redux
- react-redux VS bgscribe