The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more →
Proposal-explicit-resource-managemen Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to proposal-explicit-resource-managemen
-
-
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
terraform
Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. It is a source-available tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned.
-
-
Nim
Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
-
signoz
SigNoz is an open-source observability platform native to OpenTelemetry with logs, traces and metrics in a single application. An open-source alternative to DataDog, NewRelic, etc. 🔥 🖥. 👉 Open source Application Performance Monitoring (APM) & Observability tool
-
v
Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
Graal
GraalVM compiles Java applications into native executables that start instantly, scale fast, and use fewer compute resources 🚀
-
-
proposal-record-tuple
ECMAScript proposal for the Record and Tuple value types. | Stage 2: it will change!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better proposal-explicit-resource-managemen alternative or higher similarity.
proposal-explicit-resource-managemen reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-explicit-resource-managemen.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-28.
-
OpenTelemetry in 2023
In addition to this, is the new (stage 3 even!)explicit resource management proposal[0], supported by TypeScript version >= 5.2[1]
Though I agree that async context is better fit for this generally, the RMP should be good for telemetry around objects that have defined lifetime semantics, which is a step in the right direction you can use today
[0]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
[1]: https://www.totaltypescript.com/typescript-5-2-new-keyword-u...
-
TypeScript 5.2's New Keyword: 'using'
There's a conversation I had with Ron Buckton, the proposal champion, mainly on this specific issue. [1]
Short answer: Yes, Disposable can leak if you forget "using" it. And it will leak if the Disposable is not guarded by advanced GC mechanisms like the FinalizationRegistry.
Unlike C# where it's relatively easier to utilize its GC to dispose undisposed resources [2], properly utilizing FinalizationRegistry to do the same thing in JavaScript is not that simple. In response to our conversation, Ron is proposing adding the use of FinalizationRegistry as a best practice note [3], but only for native handles. It's mainly meant for JS engine developers.
Most JS developers wrapping anything inside a Disposable would not go through the complexity of integrating with FinalizationRegistry, thus cannot gain the same level of memory-safety, and will leak if not "using" it.
IMO this design will cause a lot of problems, misuses and abuses. But making JS to look more like C# is on Microsoft's agenda so they are probably not going to change anything.
[1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
-
Douglas Crockford: “We should stop using JavaScript”
I'm not _entirely_ sure which RAII you mean, but if you mean something like C#'s `using` or Java's `try-with-resources` or Python's `with`, then https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen... and https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-explicit-resource-man... are in stage 3 (of 4 stages) in ECMAScript's language proposal lifecycle and will be coming to a JS engine near you behind a flag soon-ish.
-
I love building a startup in Rust. I wouldn't pick it again
I'd prefer something with a more sound type system, and something that makes cleaning up resources easier and more ergonomic.
This might help with cleanup: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
But I'm not sure anything will help with the type system. For example, this drives me absolutely insane: https://www.typescriptlang.org/play#code/MYewdgziA2CmB00QHMA...
-
Go runtime: 4 years later
There's a proposal for syntax to help with this in JS, incidentally: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
-
Why Is C Faster Than Java (2009)
There is no reason why you could not, in principle, have Rust-style compile-time borrow checking in a managed language.
As an extreme example (that I have occasionally thought about doing though probably won't), you could fork TypeScript and add ownership and lifetime and inherited-mutability annotations to it, and have the compiler enforce single-ownership and shared-xor-mutable except in code that has specifically opted out of this. As with existing features of TypeScript's type system, this wouldn't affect the emitted code at all—heap allocations would still be freed nondeterministically by the tracing GC at runtime, not necessarily at the particular point in the program where they stop being used—but you'd get the maintainability benefits of not allowing unrestricted aliasing.
(Since you wouldn't have destructors, you might need to use linear instead of affine types, to ensure that programmers can't forget to call a resource object's cleanup method when they're done with it. Alternatively, you could require https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen... to be used, once that gets added to JavaScript.)
Of course, if you design a runtime specifically to be targeted by such a language, more becomes possible. See https://without.boats/blog/revisiting-a-smaller-rust/ for one sketch of what this might look like.
-
Deno Joins TC39
Things like https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen.... Essentially better language level support for objects which represent some IO resource that should be reliably closed when a user is done with it. Something like the `defer` statement in Go is really missing from JS.
-
A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
workos.com | 23 Apr 2024
Stats
Basic proposal-explicit-resource-managemen repo stats
10
-
-
-
Popular Comparisons
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS search-benchmark-game
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS librope
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS terraform-aws-jaeger
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS zipkin-api-example
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS semantic-conventions
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS SharpLab
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS Newt
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS proposal-async-context
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS proposal-class-method-parameter-decorators
- proposal-explicit-resource-managemen VS pidove
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com