pfff

Tools for code analysis, visualizations, or style-preserving source transformation. (by facebookarchive)

Pfff Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to pfff

  1. ocaml

    129 pfff VS ocaml

    The core OCaml system: compilers, runtime system, base libraries

  2. Nutrient

    Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers. Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.

    Nutrient logo
  3. ruff

    114 pfff VS ruff

    An extremely fast Python linter and code formatter, written in Rust.

  4. Gource

    85 pfff VS Gource

    software version control visualization

  5. semgrep

    80 pfff VS semgrep

    Lightweight static analysis for many languages. Find bug variants with patterns that look like source code.

  6. ast-grep

    48 pfff VS ast-grep

    ⚡A CLI tool for code structural search, lint and rewriting. Written in Rust

  7. vircadia-native-core

    Vircadia open source agent-based metaverse ecosystem.

  8. HHVM

    28 pfff VS HHVM

    A virtual machine for executing programs written in Hack.

  9. CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

    CodeRabbit logo
  10. jscodeshift

    28 pfff VS jscodeshift

    A JavaScript codemod toolkit.

  11. rewrite

    27 pfff VS rewrite

    Automated mass refactoring of source code.

  12. flow

    8 pfff VS flow

    Adds static typing to JavaScript to improve developer productivity and code quality.

  13. diffsitter

    17 pfff VS diffsitter

    A tree-sitter based AST difftool to get meaningful semantic diffs

  14. ocaml-tree-sitter-semgrep

    Generate parsers from tree-sitter grammars extended to support Semgrep patterns

  15. syntax-searcher

    Language-independent command-line utility for syntax-aware pattern matching.

  16. WhiteBeam

    WhiteBeam: Transparent endpoint security

  17. srgn

    7 pfff VS srgn

    A grep-like tool which understands source code syntax and allows for manipulation in addition to search

  18. ssr.nvim

    7 pfff VS ssr.nvim

    Treesitter based structural search and replace plugin for Neovim.

  19. infer

    42 pfff VS infer

    A static analyzer for Java, C, C++, and Objective-C

  20. gram_grep

    Search text using a grammar, lexer, or straight regex. Chain searches for greater refinement.

  21. coala

    3 pfff VS coala

    coala provides a unified command-line interface for linting and fixing all your code, regardless of the programming languages you use.

  22. oak

    2 pfff VS oak

    GO GO PARSE YOUR CODE GO GO (by go-go-golems)

  23. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better pfff alternative or higher similarity.

pfff discussion

Log in or Post with

pfff reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of pfff. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-10.

Stats

Basic pfff repo stats
6
2,422
0.0
almost 6 years ago

Sponsored
Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers
Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
www.nutrient.io

Did you know that OCaml is
the 41st most popular programming language
based on number of references?