With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js. Learn more →
Openzeppelin-contracts Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to openzeppelin-contracts
-
SurveyJS
Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App. With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js.
-
metamask-extension
:globe_with_meridians: :electric_plug: The MetaMask browser extension enables browsing Ethereum blockchain enabled websites
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
hardhat
Hardhat is a development environment to compile, deploy, test, and debug your Ethereum software.
-
truffle
Discontinued :warning: The Truffle Suite is being sunset. For information on ongoing support, migration options and FAQs, visit the Consensys blog. Thank you for all the support over the years.
-
DeFi-Developer-Road-Map
DeFi Developer roadmap is a curated Developer handbook which includes a list of the best tools for DApps development, resources and references!
-
openzeppelin-contracts-upgradeable
Upgradeable variant of OpenZeppelin Contracts, meant for use in upgradeable contracts.
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
openzeppelin-contracts reviews and mentions
-
Blockchain transactions decoding: making wallet activity understandable
Lets look the events of Open Zeppelin’s ERC20 token contract:
- Construir e implementar un VAULT (bóveda) ERC20 en Shardeum
-
Are ERC-777 Unsafe?
ERC-777 is difficult to implement properly, due to its susceptibility to different forms of attack(opens in a new tab). It is recommended to use ERC-20 instead. This page remains as a historical archive.
- OpenZeppelin is trying to avoid paying a bounty for a vulnerability that caused $1,1B worth of assets freeze
- Security improvements of the ERC20 token standard
- Ethereums most used token standard ERC20 requires security enhancements
- The most used Ethereums token standard (ERC20) requires a security patch.
-
Best Solidity Vertion
This depends if you're writing a contract from scratch or using existing code. If you're making something new, then yes (recommend not to use THE most recent available, always better to go with tried and tested). For existing projects, never try to override the solidity version. This may be a pain with "@" imports - ideally everyone should specify the library version (e.g. https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/v2.5.1/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol).
-
A note from our sponsor - SurveyJS
surveyjs.io | 23 Apr 2024
Stats
OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of openzeppelin-contracts is JavaScript.
Popular Comparisons
- openzeppelin-contracts VS solmate
- openzeppelin-contracts VS hardhat
- openzeppelin-contracts VS ERC721A
- openzeppelin-contracts VS Safemoon.sol
- openzeppelin-contracts VS solidity
- openzeppelin-contracts VS truffle
- openzeppelin-contracts VS poap-contracts
- openzeppelin-contracts VS openzeppelin-solidity
- openzeppelin-contracts VS matic-gas-prices
- openzeppelin-contracts VS metamask-extension
Sponsored