SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Nomad Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to Nomad
-
-
AppSignal
AppSignal knows why the f*#k it crashed. Stop vibe-debugging. Every exception, every backtrace, grouped so you see patterns, not noise.
-
terraform
Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. It is a source-available tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Kargo
Kargo - optimize your multi-stage deployment pipelines using GitOps. Kargo automates promotion across dev, staging, and prod with approval gates and verification. Open source, built by the team behind Argo CD. Download now.
-
-
homebrew-core
🍻 Default and OSS formulae (built-from-source packages) for the package manager for everywhere
-
-
consul
Consul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.
-
-
-
openbao
OpenBao is a software solution to manage, store, and distribute sensitive data including secrets, certificates, and keys.
-
uncloud
A lightweight tool for deploying and managing containerised applications across a network of Docker hosts. Bridging the gap between Docker and Kubernetes ✨
-
-
Rundeck
Enable Self-Service Operations: Give specific users access to your existing tools, services, and scripts
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
Nomad discussion
Nomad reviews and mentions
- Show HN: Antfly: Distributed, Multimodal Search and Memory and Graphs in Go
-
Lightweight tool for deploying containerised applications across servers
Their license does not allow you to modify it and then offer it as a service to others: https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/blob/main/LICENSE
You can't really do anything with it except work for Hashicorp for free, or create a fork that nobody is allowed to use unless they self-host it.
-
Terraform, Ansible, Pulumi? The DevOps tooling stack that didn’t burn me out
Nomad by HashiCorp
-
Cracking the Vault: How we found zero-day flaws in HashiCorp Vault
you could mitigate this with mTLS, but then that breaks vault/nomad integration as they don't support mTLS for that, and I was told to pound sand on their issue tracker.
https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/24970
https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/how-to-use-mtls-with-nomad-w...
-
IBM Completes Acquisition of HashiCorp
20k+ nodes and 200k+ allocs. To be fair, Kubernetes cannot support this large of a cluster.
Most of my issues with it aren't related to the scale though. I wasn't involved in the operations of the cluster, I was just a user of Nomad trying to run a few thousand stateful allocs. Without custom resources and custom controllers, managing stateful services was a pain in the ass. Critical bugs would also often take years to get fixed. I had lots of fun getting paged in the middle of the night because 2 allocs would suddenly decide they now have the same index (https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/10727)
-
Dear friend, you have built a Kubernetes
https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/blob/v1.6.0/website/conte... seems to have existed since before the license rug-pull. However I'm open to there being some miscommunication because https://developer.hashicorp.com/nomad/docs/glossary doesn't mention the word "control" and the word "host" could mean any number of things in this context
- Nomad: Simple, flexible scheduler, orchestrator to deploy and manage containers
-
Faster, Easier Deployments: How We Simplified Our Infrastructure with Nomad in 15 Hours (Goodbye, Kubernetes!)
Nomad: The Oasis in Our Infrastructure Desert
-
Building a highly-available web service without a database
> I should have just used on-disk mode from the start, but only now know better.
Yeah, I saw the recent post about reducing rqlite disk space usage. Using the on-disk sqlite as both the FSM and the Raft snapshot makes a lot of sense here. I'm curious whether you've had concerns about write amplification though? Because we have only the periodic Raft snapshots and the FSM is in-memory, during high write volumes we're only really hammering disk with the Raft logs.
> Do you find it in the field much with Nomad? I've managed to introduce new Raft Entry types very infrequently during rqlite's 10-years of development, only once did someone hit it in the field with rqlite.
My understanding is that rqlite Raft entries are mostly SQL statements (is that right?). Where Nomad is somewhat different (and probably closer to the OP) is that the Raft entries are application-level entries. For entries that are commands like "stop this job"[0] upgrades are simple.
The tricky entries are where the entry is "upsert this large deeply-nested object that I've serialized", like the Job or Node (where the workloads run). The typical bug here is you've added a field way down in the guts of one of these objects that's a pointer to a new struct. When old versions deserialize the message they ignore the new field and that's easy to reason about. But if the leader is still on an old version and the new code deserializes the old object, you need to make sure you're not missing any nil pointer checks. Without sum types enforced at compile time (i.e. Option/Maybe), we have to catch all these via code review and a lot of tedious upgrade testing.
> it requires discipline on the part of the end-users too.
Oh for sure. Nomad runs into some commercial realities here around how much discipline we can demand from end-users. =)
[0] https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/blob/v1.8.2/nomad/fsm.go#...
- We migrated onto K8s in less than 12 months
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 16 Sep 2026
Stats
hashicorp/nomad is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of Nomad is Go.