Nanodb-specification Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to nanodb-specification

Bitcoin

906 75,561 10.0 C++ nanodb-specification VS Bitcoin

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
libbitcoin-system

112 1,263 8.7 C++ nanodb-specification VS libbitcoin-system

Bitcoin Cross-Platform C++ Development Toolkit
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
ic

42 1,469 10.0 Rust nanodb-specification VS ic

Internet Computer blockchain source: the client/replica software run by nodes
heed

17 433 9.0 Rust nanodb-specification VS heed

A fully typed LMDB wrapper with minimum overhead 🐦
bitcore

17 4,760 9.6 JavaScript nanodb-specification VS bitcore

A full stack for bitcoin and blockchain-based applications
btcd

11 6,070 9.0 Go nanodb-specification VS btcd

An alternative full node bitcoin implementation written in Go (golang)
bitcoin

5 191 0.0 C++ nanodb-specification VS bitcoin

Bitcoin Knots enhanced Bitcoin node/wallet software (by bitcoinknots)
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
rkv

2 295 3.9 Rust nanodb-specification VS rkv

A simple, humane, typed key-value storage solution.
montydb

5 573 4.5 Python nanodb-specification VS montydb

Monty, Mongo tinified. MongoDB implemented in Python !

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better nanodb-specification alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to nanodb-specification

nanodb-specification reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of nanodb-specification. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-19.

[Requesting Help] LMDB Databases in Rust
4 projects | /r/rust | 19 Jan 2022

Hello all. I'm having some issues using https://github.com/mozilla/rkv wrapper for LMDB database operations. I want to read a table called 'accounts' from a cryptocurrency's ledger database file (specifically the nano ledger). There is an example doing this in python here in the sample folder if it might help, but I can't translate much over myself that has proved useful.
It's official - Nano is no longer among the top 100 coins
7 projects | /r/CryptoCurrency | 8 Jul 2021

And besides, Bitcoin nodes aren’t incentivized either. I see you’re an ETH fan though, so we can use that as an example instead. Eth is at 860 GB of storage and their nodes aren’t directly incentivized either. So why is it only an issue for NANO? I don’t know how much space ETH transactions take but I was actually mistaken about NANO’s. Since NANO requires two blocks for a full confirmation (send and receive), it would be 432 bytes(216 each block) between two already existing accounts. I believe new accounts take space as well but let’s just use the 58.8 GB current ledger size divided by the current amount of blocks per nano looker and you have roughly 478 bytes per transaction. So roughly 8.72TB a year if we see it do 50 million transactions a day. And mind you this is a simple SoV/MoE coin, not a smart contract platform. I would be shocked if it did 50 million transactions a day anytime soon, even if it saw widespread success. But again, I foresee ETH’s ledger size increasing much more rapidly so why is it that the lack of direct incentive for running a node is only an issue for NANO?