Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free. Learn more →
Moby Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to Moby
-
-
Nutrient
Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library. Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
bitwarden_rs
Discontinued Unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs [Moved to: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden]
-
-
-
-
-
Lean and Mean Docker containers
Slim(toolkit): Don't change anything in your container image and minify it by up to 30x (and for compiled languages even more) making it secure too! (free and open source)
-
CPM.cmake
📦 CMake's missing package manager. A small CMake script for setup-free, cross-platform, reproducible dependency management.
-
-
nerdctl
contaiNERD CTL - Docker-compatible CLI for containerd, with support for Compose, Rootless, eStargz, OCIcrypt, IPFS, ...
-
Packer
Packer is a tool for creating identical machine images for multiple platforms from a single source configuration.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
Moby discussion
Moby reviews and mentions
-
Using cURL Inside a Docker Container
If we run the command without -i option (i.e. with only -t option), a pseudo-TTY will be allocated and the shell will start, but no commands can be accepted and we cannot continue the operation because STDIN is disabled. To forcefully exit from a container in this state, we need to send three consecutive SIGINT signals by pressing cmd + . same times. And this exiting does not trigger the automatic container removal provided by --rm option, so we need to trigger it by stopping the container or remove the container directly.
-
A story on home server security
Docker has a known security issue with port exposure in that it punches holes through the firewall without asking your permission, see https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/4737
I usually expose ports like `127.0.0.1:1234:1234` instead of `1234:1234`. As far as I understand, it still punches holes this way but to access the container, the attacker would need to get a packet routed to the host with a spoofed IP SRC set to `127.0.0.1`. All other solutions that are better seem to be much more involved.
-
Which Docker variant am I using and where is the daemon running?
When using the Docker Engine on Linux directly, based on the Moby project, you can run
-
Day 23: Docker Resources
Moby is the open-source foundation of Docker Engine. Diving into this codebase will help you understand:
-
Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
Originally Docker created only containers. In fact, it used LXC as an "exec driver" which is basically what we call runtime today or at least the closest thing to it. It was deprecated in Docker 1.8.0.
-
You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
The first commit of Docker happened on January 19, 2013. You can still find it on GitHub: https://github.com/moby/moby/commit/a27b4b8cb8e838d03a99b6d2b30f76bdaf2f9e5d
-
You're probably not vulnerable to the CUPS CVE
I think one of the culprits of this bad default is docker containers.
Since a container runs your code in a network namespace, in that context '127.0.0.1' really means "accessible inside the container, effectively nowhere", and '0.0.0.0' means "accessible only on the local machine" (except that's not actually true, check out this open issue lol https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/22054 )
I think that's one reason for some software's default of 0.0.0.0 - people are cargo-culting from stuff that runs in docker and/or people want there stuff to run in docker and work by default.
-
The Docker Ecosystem Explained
Docker Engine development has migrated to the Moby Project, an open source framework maintained by the Docker team. Before the migration in 2020, Docker Engine was a maintained fork of the Moby Project that featured select components from it.
-
5 Alternatives to Docker Desktop
Rancher Desktop allows you to choose between the Moby engine (offered by Continered) and the dockerd engine (offered by Docker) for building, pushing, and running containers. Compared with Docker Desktop, which provides Docker CLI as a CLI tool, Rancher provides both kubectl and nerdctl for managing Kubernetes and containers, respectively.
-
Vendoring, or go mod vendor: What Is It?
Moby: Made by Docker to really push forward software containerization.
-
A note from our sponsor - Nutrient
nutrient.io | 14 Feb 2025
Stats
moby/moby is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of Moby is Go.