SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Liblinux Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to liblinux
-
-
InfluxDB
InfluxDB high-performance time series database. Collect, organize, and act on massive volumes of high-resolution data to power real-time intelligent systems.
-
-
Redis
Redis is an in-memory database that persists on disk. The data model is key-value, but many different kind of values are supported: Strings, Lists, Sets, Sorted Sets, Hashes, Streams, HyperLogLogs, Bitmaps.
-
-
Git
Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository but pull requests can be turned into patches to the mailing list via GitGitGadget (https://gitgitgadget.github.io/). Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches procedure for any of your improvements.
-
oils
Oils is our upgrade path from bash to a better language and runtime. It's also for Python and JavaScript users who avoid shell!
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
AppImageKit
Package desktop applications as AppImages that run on common Linux-based operating systems, such as RHEL, CentOS, openSUSE, SLED, Ubuntu, Fedora, debian and derivatives. Join #AppImage on irc.libera.chat
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better liblinux alternative or higher similarity.
liblinux discussion
liblinux reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of liblinux.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-03.
- Liblinux – architecture-independent access to Linux system calls
-
A standalone zero-dependency Lisp for Linux
> libc isn't really getting in the way here.
For the standard set of system calls, the libc is pretty great. For Linux-specific features, it could take years for glibc to gain support. Perhaps it's gotten better since then, perhaps it still takes years. I don't know.
Years ago I read about the tale of the getrandom system call and the quest to get glibc to support it:
https://lwn.net/Articles/711013/
A kernel hacker wrote in an email:
> maybe the kernel developers should support a libinux.a library that would allow us to bypass glibc when they are being non-helpful
That made a lot of sense to me. I took that concept and kind of ran with it. Started a liblinux project, essentially a libc with nothing but the thinnest possible system call wrappers. Researched quite a bit about glibc's attitude towards Linux to justify it:
https://github.com/matheusmoreira/liblinux#why
Eventually I discovered Linux was already doing the same thing with their own nolibc.h file which they were already using in their own tools. It was a single file back then, by now it's become a sprawling directory full of code:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/tools/include/...
Even asked Greg Kroah-Hartman on reddit about it once:
https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/fx5e4v/im_greg_kroah...
Since the kernel was developing their own awesome headers, I decided to drop liblinux and start lone instead. :)
-
Nolibc: A minimal C-library replacement shipped with the kernel
It gives you access to 100% of Linux's system calls. It eliminates a lot of global state. It gets rid of a lot of legacy libc crap.
Years ago I wrote a fairly referenced rationale in my liblinux project:
https://github.com/matheusmoreira/liblinux/blob/master/READM...
-
Win32 Is the Only Stable ABI on Linux
> Now, do I think it would make total sense for syscall wrappers and NSS to be split into their own libs (or dbus interfaces maybe) with stable ABIs to enable other libc's, absolutely!
I worked on this a few years ago: liblinux.
https://github.com/matheusmoreira/liblinux
I'm not developing it anymore though because I found out the Linux kernel itself has a superior nolibc library:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/tools/include/...
It used to be a single header but it looks like they've recently organized it into a proper project!
I wonder if it will become some kind of official kernel library at some point. I asked Greg Kroah-Hartman about this and he mentioned there was once a klibc:
https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/fx5e4v/im_greg_kroah...
> This is something the BSD's got absolutely right.
BSDs, every other operating system really, force us to use the bundled C libraries and the C ABI. I think Linux's approach is better. It has a language-agnostic system call binary interface: it's just a simple calling convention and the system call instruction.
The right place for system call support is the compiler. We should have system_call keywords that cause it to emit code in the aforementioned calling convention. With this single keyword, it's possible to do program literally anything on Linux. Wrappers for every specific system call should be part of every language's standard library with language-specific types and semantics.
-
Oasis: Small statically-linked Linux system
I'm not using this stuff professionally, it's just my own home lab's virtual machines with little services implemented as freestanding C programs. Not doing anything fancy right now, much of it was just to see if I could do it.
I've seen other people commenting here on HN saying they're using the same approach so it's defenitely not my invention.
I published some of my work in the form of a liblinux that I use to make system calls:
https://github.com/matheusmoreira/liblinux
I'm not developing it anymore though because I found out the kernel itself has a nolibc library:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/tools/include/...
It used to be a single header but it looks like they've organized it into a proper project.
-
A Tutorial on Portable Makefiles
That's awesome. I didn't know about rwildcard until now. Is it part of GMSL? I searched for rwildcard on gmsl.sourceforge.io but didn't find it.
I think my function is needlessly complicated compared to rwildcard. Here's my code:
https://github.com/matheusmoreira/liblinux/blob/modular-buil...
https://github.com/matheusmoreira/liblinux/blob/modular-buil...
The file? and directory? functions were inspired by GMSL.
I wrote a general recursion function. It takes a function to apply to lists and a function to compute whether an element is a base case.
The recursive file system traversal function applies a directory globbing function to the list of paths and has file? as base case.
The find function filters out any items not matching a given predicate function. It was my intention to provide predicates like C_file? and header_file? but I stopped developing that project before that happened.
I think rwildcard is probably simpler and more efficient!
- GitHub - matheusmoreira/liblinux: Linux system calls.
- liblinux: Architecture-independent access to Linux system calls
- Liblinux is a C library that provides architecture-independent access to Linux system calls.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 26 Apr 2025
Stats
Basic liblinux repo stats
16
195
0.0
over 5 years ago
matheusmoreira/liblinux is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of liblinux is Makefile.
Sponsored
InfluxDB high-performance time series database
Collect, organize, and act on massive volumes of high-resolution data to power real-time intelligent systems.
influxdata.com