Libcxx Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to libcxx
-
-
-
SonarQube
Static code analysis for 29 languages.. Your projects are multi-language. So is SonarQube analysis. Find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells so you can release quality code every time. Get started analyzing your projects today for free.
-
-
nft_ptr
C++ `std::unique_ptr` that represents each object as an NFT on the Ethereum blockchain
-
-
learnxinyminutes-docs
Code documentation written as code! How novel and totally my idea!
-
-
Scout APM
Less time debugging, more time building. Scout APM allows you to find and fix performance issues with no hassle. Now with error monitoring and external services monitoring, Scout is a developer's best friend when it comes to application development.
-
-
-
-
-
libcxx reviews and mentions
- Intrusive List Advantages?
-
“Sustainability with Rust” wrong about Go
I mean, there shouldn't be any, given how many C++ standard libraries implement `operator new` on top of malloc. If anything it should be less efficient once you factor in constructor calls.
libc++: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/master/src/new.cp...
-
To Learn a New Language, Read Its Standard Library
Here is a basic structure implemented in C++:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/master/include/ve...
I would not recommend anyone ever look through that as a way to learn C++. Heck just something as basic as a struct that stores two member variables is a horror show in C++:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/78d6a7767ed57b501...
-
Is WebAssembly magic performance pixie dust?
Literally every vector implementation in existence works like that. The code to do it is really not complicated. Here's the Rust implementation - it literally just doubles the capacity. Doesn't even try to use powers of 2 or anything like that. The Clang one is similar. Literally just max(cap*2, required_cap).
-
std::unique_ptr implementation backed by Ethereum NFTs (written in Rust)
The joke is also that unique_ptr has no additional overhead compared to a regular pointer as long as it has a trivial deleter. The only overhead is if you have to null-initialize the pointer, or provide a custom deleter. Specifically, this is because there's a compressed pair of the pointer and deleter, which optimizes the pair to only be the size of the pointer if the deleter is trivial or a 0-size struct (which default_delete is).
Stats
llvm-mirror/libcxx is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
Popular Comparisons
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.